Digitalni repozitorij raziskovalnih organizacij Slovenije

Izpis gradiva
A+ | A- | Pomoč | SLO | ENG

Naslov:Impact of chest tube type on pain, drainage efficacy, and short-term treatment outcome following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy : a randomized controlled trial comparing coaxial silicone drains and standard polyvinyl chloride drains
Avtorji:ID Greif, Boris (Avtor)
ID Žgajnar, Janez (Avtor)
ID Štupnik, Tomaž (Avtor)
Datoteke:.pdf PDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (284,09 KB)
MD5: D19DAC839605789760A994BE8761A85C
 
URL URL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://jtd.amegroups.org/article/view/96693/html
 
Jezik:Angleški jezik
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:Logo UKC LJ - Univerzitetni klinični center Ljubljana
Povzetek:Background: Chest drains are routinely used after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lung resections to evacuate fluid and air from the pleural space. We compared the impact of coaxial silicone (SIL) drains vs. standard polyvinyl chloride (PVC) drains on postoperative pain, drainage efficacy, and short-term treatment outcome following VATS lobectomy. Methods: The prospective randomized study included 80 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for lung cancer between September 2020 and June 2023. Patients were randomized into two groups based on the type of chest drain used postoperatively: 40 in the experimental group (coaxial SIL drain Fr 24) and 40 in the control group (standard PVC drain Fr 24). The researchers collecting the data and the caregivers were not blinded to the group allocation. The primary objective was to evaluate pain over the initial 2 postoperative days by assessing analgesic consumption, respiratory muscle strength [measured as maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)], and pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS). MIP, MEP, and VAS were measured both at rest and during physical activity. Results: Sixty-nine patients were included in the final analysis: 35 in the experimental group and 34 in the control group. The groups were comparable in terms of drainage efficacy and short-term treatment outcome, but pain was significantly lower in the experimental group (coaxial SIL drain). Diclofenac consumption was significantly lower in the experimental group (P=0.004), with a trend toward lower consumption of other analgesics. All respiratory muscle strength measurements were higher in the experimental group, with significant differences in static MIP on the second postoperative day (P=0.046), both static (P=0.02) and dynamic (P=0.050) MEP on the first postoperative day, and static MEP on the second postoperative day (P=0.02). Static VAS (S-VAS) on the first postoperative day was statistically significantly lower in the experimental group (P=0.003). Dynamic VAS (D-VAS) was comparable between the groups. Conclusions: This study confirmed the hypothesis that coaxial SIL drains, owing to their softer material, cause less pain while maintaining efficacy comparable to standard PVC drains.
Ključne besede:video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, VATS, lobectomy, postoperative pain, chest tube, analgesia
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Verzija publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2025
Št. strani:str. 932-943
Številčenje:Vol. 17, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-24693 Novo okno
UDK:616-089
ISSN pri članku:2077-6624
DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1489 Novo okno
COBISS.SI-ID:256318211 Novo okno
Opomba:Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 7. 11. 2025;
Datum objave v DiRROS:12.12.2025
Število ogledov:48
Število prenosov:21
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share


Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Journal of thoracic disease
Skrajšan naslov:J. thorac. dis.
Založnik:Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company
ISSN:2077-6624
COBISS.SI-ID:175662851 Novo okno

Licence

Licenca:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:Najbolj omejujoča licenca Creative Commons. Uporabniki lahko prenesejo in delijo delo v nekomercialne namene in ga ne smejo uporabiti za nobene druge namene.

Nazaj