Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Impact of chest tube type on pain, drainage efficacy, and short-term treatment outcome following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy : a randomized controlled trial comparing coaxial silicone drains and standard polyvinyl chloride drains
Authors:ID Greif, Boris (Author)
ID Žgajnar, Janez (Author)
ID Štupnik, Tomaž (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (284,09 KB)
MD5: D19DAC839605789760A994BE8761A85C
 
URL URL - Source URL, visit https://jtd.amegroups.org/article/view/96693/html
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo UKC LJ - Ljubljana University Medical Centre
Abstract:Background: Chest drains are routinely used after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lung resections to evacuate fluid and air from the pleural space. We compared the impact of coaxial silicone (SIL) drains vs. standard polyvinyl chloride (PVC) drains on postoperative pain, drainage efficacy, and short-term treatment outcome following VATS lobectomy. Methods: The prospective randomized study included 80 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for lung cancer between September 2020 and June 2023. Patients were randomized into two groups based on the type of chest drain used postoperatively: 40 in the experimental group (coaxial SIL drain Fr 24) and 40 in the control group (standard PVC drain Fr 24). The researchers collecting the data and the caregivers were not blinded to the group allocation. The primary objective was to evaluate pain over the initial 2 postoperative days by assessing analgesic consumption, respiratory muscle strength [measured as maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)], and pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS). MIP, MEP, and VAS were measured both at rest and during physical activity. Results: Sixty-nine patients were included in the final analysis: 35 in the experimental group and 34 in the control group. The groups were comparable in terms of drainage efficacy and short-term treatment outcome, but pain was significantly lower in the experimental group (coaxial SIL drain). Diclofenac consumption was significantly lower in the experimental group (P=0.004), with a trend toward lower consumption of other analgesics. All respiratory muscle strength measurements were higher in the experimental group, with significant differences in static MIP on the second postoperative day (P=0.046), both static (P=0.02) and dynamic (P=0.050) MEP on the first postoperative day, and static MEP on the second postoperative day (P=0.02). Static VAS (S-VAS) on the first postoperative day was statistically significantly lower in the experimental group (P=0.003). Dynamic VAS (D-VAS) was comparable between the groups. Conclusions: This study confirmed the hypothesis that coaxial SIL drains, owing to their softer material, cause less pain while maintaining efficacy comparable to standard PVC drains.
Keywords:video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, VATS, lobectomy, postoperative pain, chest tube, analgesia
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 932-943
Numbering:Vol. 17, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-24693 New window
UDC:616-089
ISSN on article:2077-6624
DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1489 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:256318211 New window
Note:Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 7. 11. 2025;
Publication date in DiRROS:12.12.2025
Views:54
Downloads:22
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Journal of thoracic disease
Shortened title:J. thorac. dis.
Publisher:Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company
ISSN:2077-6624
COBISS.SI-ID:175662851 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Back