| Naslov: | Regenerative urban transformation in urban planning : a systematic review of key themes and planning implications |
|---|
| Avtorji: | ID Başcan Yüce, Selin (Avtor)
ID Tezer, Azime (Avtor) |
|---|
| Datoteke: |  PDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (926,73 KB)
MD5: B51E220DF8937FAD73A6A91FA4BB33E6
|
|---|
| Jezik: | Angleški jezik |
|---|
| Tipologija: | 1.02 - Pregledni znanstveni članek |
|---|
| Organizacija: |  UIRS - Urbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije
|
|---|
| Povzetek: | Regenerative development has gained prominence as an ecological paradigm in urban planning; however, its integration into urban transformation processes remains conceptually fragmented and uneven in practice. This study examines how regenerative development is framed within discussions on urban transformation, with a particular focus on its implications for planning systems and policymaking. A systematic literature review, guided by PRISMA protocols, identified thirty-eight peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus, which were coded using MAXQDA and analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. The findings reveal five interrelated dimensions of regenerative urban transformation (RUT): underlying rationales, key components, implementation challenges, modes of integration into urban planning, and evaluation approaches. The literature positions RUT as a response to the unsustainability of dominant urban models that degrade ecosystems and increase climate vulnerability. Core components – such as circular economy principles, public participation, adaptive reuse, and digital technologies – are widely acknowledged but often addressed as isolated interventions rather than integrated planning mechanisms. Key challenges include limited social acceptance, financing constraints, behavioural change requirements, and weak institutional coordination. Although integration into urban planning is commonly framed through alignment with sustainable development strategies and ecosystem services, persistent gaps remain in governance alignment and policy coherence. The study concludes that current assessment tools suffer from limited scale adaptability and weak links to planning and policy decision-making, constraining the practical evaluation of RUT. |
|---|
| Ključne besede: | regenerative development, regenerative urbanism, urban regeneration, circular city, reflexive thematic analysis |
|---|
| Status publikacije: | Objavljeno |
|---|
| Verzija publikacije: | Objavljena publikacija |
|---|
| Poslano v recenzijo: | 10.01.2026 |
|---|
| Datum sprejetja članka: | 14.04.2026 |
|---|
| Datum objave: | 30.06.2026 |
|---|
| Leto izida: | 2026 |
|---|
| Št. strani: | str. 89-114 |
|---|
| Številčenje: | Letn. 37, št. 1 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DiRROS-31262  |
|---|
| UDK: | 71 |
|---|
| ISSN pri članku: | 0353-6483 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.5379/urbani-izziv-2026-37-01-04 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 283207683 |
|---|
| Opomba: | Besedilo v angl., prevod v slov.;
|
|---|
| Datum objave v DiRROS: | 23.07.2026 |
|---|
| Število ogledov: | 108 |
|---|
| Število prenosov: | 45 |
|---|
| Metapodatki: |    |
|---|
|
:
|
Kopiraj citat |
|---|
| | | | Objavi na: |  |
|---|
Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše
podrobnosti ali sproži prenos. |
