91. |
92. |
93. |
94. |
95. Action A3 :
analysis of spatial connectivity and preparation of environmental impact assessment guidelines :
prepared within A3 action of LIFE DINALP BEAR Project (LIFE13 NAT/SI/0005)Mariano Rodriguez Recio, Klemen Jerina, Felix Knauer, Anja Molinari-Jobin, Claudio Groff, Đuro Huber, Paolo Molinari, Luca Pedrotti, Stefano Filacorda, 2018, končno poročilo o rezultatih raziskav Povzetek: As for other large carnivores in Europe, the brown bear shows a trend of recovering under different management scenarios. However, this recovery comes with specific biological and conservation requirements at individual and population levels often followed by conflicts in a highly humanized continent. To foresee conflicts with humans and to facilitate decisionmaking, spatially-explicit research is required to identify potential habitats and the connectivity of fragmented bear populations. First, we conducted multiscale modeling based on scale-integrated resource selection functions (SRSFs) to identify drivers shaping the spaceuse of three bear populations/demographic units (Trentino-Swiss, pre-Alps, and Dinaric), and across 3 scales of space (population distribution, home range establishment, and use of individual home range). Secondly, we also conducted an analysis of the connectivity patterns of suitable habitat patches (nodes) to identify the potential importance of each node to contribute to individual mobility, survival, and population connectivity. Lastly, to support further environmental impact assessment analyses, we identified the most plausible least-cost paths connecting different areas of the same large patch with itself and surrounding patches. Using topographic, landcover, and anthropogenic predictors, our analytical approach transcended from scale dependence bias to produce a predictive map on habitat suitability while delivered information on habitat selection trends for each population. Bears mostly selected forest habitats in all the populations; however, habitat selection differed for the other variables among populations and scales, especially in the Trentino area where the species selected the most intricate topography. Predictive maps revealed a broad range of suitable but fragmented patches of bear habitat. The largest and most important patches for connectivity occurred in the current distribution range of the species, with the most suitable habitat lying in the pre-Alpine and Dinaric populations. Connecting viable patches to host female homeranges is possible through stepping-stone patches of corridors reachable within the estimated dispersal distance of females. Unified transnational decision-making is required for the conservation of stepping-stone patches, facilitate bear mobility, and ultimately connect bear populations.
Objavljeno v DiRROS: 01.07.2019; Ogledov: 2191; Prenosov: 933
 Celotno besedilo (6,88 MB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
96. |
97. |
98. Projekt LIFE DINALP BEAR za celovito upravljanje in varstvo rjavega medveda v severnih Dinaridih in AlpahNives Pagon, Samar Al Sayegh-Petkovšek, Matej Bartol, Tomaž Berce, Sonia Calderola, Rok Černe, Urša Fležar, Claudio Groff, Đuro Huber, Ida Jelenko Turinek, Klemen Jerina, Marko Jonozovič, Irena Kavčič, Felix Knauer, Miha Krofel, Bojana Lavrič, Aleksandra Majić Skrbinšek, Miha Marenče, Urška Marinko, Anja Molinari-Jobin, Boštjan Pokorny, Hubert Potočnik, Slaven Reljic, Tomaž Skrbinšek, Matija Stergar, Bojan Vivoda, 2018, poljudni članek Ključne besede: rjavi medved, gospodarjenje z divjadjo, LIFE DINALP BEAR, Dinaridi, Alpe
Objavljeno v DiRROS: 20.06.2018; Ogledov: 4842; Prenosov: 861
Celotno besedilo (428,28 KB) |
99. Onkološko genetsko svetovanje in testiranje : odnos, poznavanje in praksa zdravnikov na primarni ravni : povzetek Prešernove nalogeTina Škerl, Anja Meden Boltežar, Mateja Krajc, Vaneja Velenik, 2016, izvirni znanstveni članek Povzetek: Ocenjuje se, da je 5 do 10 % rakov dednih. Za osebe, ki imajo visoko verjetnost za dednega raka, je indicirano onkološko genetsko svetovanje. Poročila Ambulante za onkološko genetsko svetovanje Onkološkega inštituta Ljubljana kažejo, da slovenski zdravniki, predvsem na področju dednega raka debelega črevesa in danke, bolnike premalo napotujejo na onkološko genetsko svetovanje ter gensko testiranje. Namen raziskave je bil ugotoviti, koliko splošni zdravniki in specialisti družinske medicine v Sloveniji vedo o družinskih ter dedno pogojenih oblikah raka in zakaj na svetovanje ter testiranje ne napotujejo svojih pacientov. V okviru presečne raziskave smo slovenskim splošnim zdravnikom in specialistom družinske medicine poslali povezavo do anonimnega spletnega vprašalnika. Pri tem odgovori kažejo, da 49 % vprašanih v zadnjem letu na svetovanje in testiranje ni napotilo nobenega bolnika, 22 % zdravnikov pa ni dovolj seznanjenih z indikacijami za napotitev na svetovanje in testiranje. Nadalje 41 % zdravnikov nima dovolj časa za preverjanje družinske anamneze v smislu raka. Na 18 zastavljenih vprašanj o dednih rakih so povprečno pravilno odgovorili na 8,5 ± 3,2 oziroma 47-odstotno. Na vprašanja o dednem raku dojk so ženske zbrale 11 % več pravilnih odgovorov kot moški. Zdravniki, ki so napotili vsaj enega bolnika, so pravilno rešili povprečno 4 % več vprašanj kot tisti, ki niso napotili nobenega bolnika. Splošni zdravniki v Sloveniji premalo napotujejo bolnike in njihove svojce na onkološko genetsko svetovanje ter testiranje, ker niso dovolj seznanjeni z indikacijami za napotitev in ker nimajo dovolj časa za preverjanje družinske anamneze v smislu raka pri svojih bolnikih med rednim delom.
Ključne besede: genetsko svetovanje, onkologija, testiranje, indikacije, zdravniki
Objavljeno v DiRROS: 16.03.2018; Ogledov: 3547; Prenosov: 925
Celotno besedilo (468,91 KB) |
100. |
