| Title: | Incidence of symptomatic Lyme borreliosis in nine European countries |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Angulo, Frederick J. (Author)
ID Colby, Emily (Author)
ID Lebech, Anne-Mette (Author)
ID Lindgren, Per-Eric (Author)
ID Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna (Author)
ID Strle, Franc (Author)
ID Olsen, Julia (Author)
ID Brestrich, Gordon (Author)
ID Vyse, Andrew (Author)
ID Shafquat, Madiha (Author), et al. |
|---|
| Files: |  PDF - Presentation file, download (885,03 KB)
MD5: 862D4242136650FF67A71EBC30679AF6
 URL - Source URL, visit https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(24)00313-8/fulltext
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: |  UKC LJ - Ljubljana University Medical Centre
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Objectives: To better understand the Lyme borreliosis (LB) burden in Europe, we aimed to estimate the incidence of symptomatic Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bbsl) infections after adjusting public health LB surveillance data for under-detection of symptomatic Bbsl infections. Methods: Data from seroprevalence studies and estimates of the symptomatic proportion and duration of antibody detection in Bbsl-infected individuals, derived from reviews of the published literature, were used to adjust public health LB surveillance data to estimate the incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection in nine European countries from 2018 to 2022. Results: The prevalence of anti-Bbsl antibodies ranged from 2.3% in Romania to 9.4% in Germany. Under- detection multipliers varied across surveillance systems; using 10-year duration of antibody detection, multipliers were 2.4-10.5 in countries reporting all LB cases and 54.6-722.2 in countries reporting only Lyme neuroborreliosis cases. The incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection adjusted for under-detection was highest in Finland, Germany, Norway, Poland, and Switzerland, intermediate in the Czech Republic and Denmark, and lowest in Ireland and Romania. Conclusion: Adjustment of LB surveillance for under-detection found a high incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection in several European countries. Differences in LB surveillance systems should be considered when comparing surveillance data between countries and when estimating LB disease burden. |
|---|
| Keywords: | lyme disease, epidemiology, disease burden, surveillance, seroprevalence, tickborne diseases |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2024 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 1-8 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Vol. 149, [article no.] ǂ107242 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DiRROS-29960  |
|---|
| UDC: | 578.834 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1201-9712 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107242 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 218543619 |
|---|
| Note: |
|
|---|
| Publication date in DiRROS: | 10.06.2026 |
|---|
| Views: | 89 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 86 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
