Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:European prognosis evaluation of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patterns after lobectomy versus segmentectomy based on clinical stage settings
Authors:ID Lula, Lukadi Joseph (Author)
ID Huang, Lin (Author)
ID Forcada Barreda, Clara (Author)
ID Costa, Rita (Author)
ID Domjan, Matic (Author)
ID Franssen, A.J.P.M. (Author)
ID Jašovič, Črt (Author)
ID Štupnik, Tomaž (Author), et al.
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (760,27 KB)
MD5: E19244756D65E1DF7520E9FC33923668
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo UKC LJ - Ljubljana University Medical Centre
Abstract:Objectives: To investigate the prognosis of peripheral early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patterns treated by lobectomy or segmentectomy. Methods: Retrospective multicentric cohort of patients with cT1a-bN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy with systematic lymph node dissection in 10 European centers (one per country) from 2015 to 2021. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and lung cancer–specific death (LCSD) between both groups were assessed in entire dataset and in dataset of histologic aggressive patterns, before and after propensity score-matching (PSM). Prognostic risk factors were analyzed using parsimonious model Cox regression. Recurrences were assessed by linearized risks. Results: Lobectomy and segmentectomy were performed in 1029 (73.1%) and 377 (26.8%) patients, respectively. In total, 427 (30.3%) patients had at least 1 histologic aggressive (micropapillary or solid) pattern, and 88 patients (20.7%) underwent segmentectomy. OS, DFS, and LCSD rates were similar between patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy, in both datasets, before and after PSM. In aggressive dataset, PSM, 5-year OS rates were lobectomy 88.0% (95% CI, 80.9-95.7%), segmentectomy 89.1% (95% CI, 82.2-96.6%), P = .8; 5-year DFS rates were lobectomy 79.8% (95% CI, 70.8-89.8%), segmentectomy 80.6% (95% CI, 71.6-90.6%), P = .6; and 5-year LCSD rates were lobectomy 6.0%, segmentectomy 7.8%, P = .8. Locoregional recurrence was not superior in patients who underwent segmentectomy in entire dataset (linearized risks: lobectomy 0.078, segmentectomy 0.073) and in aggressive dataset (linearized risks: lobectomy 0.036, segmentectomy 0.011) only in the unmatched cohorts. Aggressive histologic patterns impacted on only LCSD, and only when they were dominant. Conclusions: Segmentectomy seems comparable to lobectomy for patients with peripheral cT1a-bN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma even in case of histologic aggressive patterns.
Keywords:lobectomy, lung adenocarcinoma, segmentectomy, patterns, prognosis
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2026
Number of pages:str. 1-11
Numbering:Vol. 30, [article no.] ǂ101687
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-29212 New window
UDC:616-089:616.2
ISSN on article:2666-2736
DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2026.101687 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:272067075 New window
Note:Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis z dne 18. 3. 2026;
Publication date in DiRROS:24.04.2026
Views:32
Downloads:10
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:JTCVS open
Publisher:Elsevier, Inc.
ISSN:2666-2736
COBISS.SI-ID:96252419 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Back