Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Review of Ingarden’s The Literary Work of Art
Authors:ID Blaustein, Leopold (Author)
ID Gołaszewski, Filip (Translator)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/15_E-PHI_134-135_Blaustein-5.pdf
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (1,51 MB)
MD5: 8E05D7094EB1E2A030F539EB2B64581A
 
Language:English
Typology:1.19 - Review, Book Review, Critique
Organization:Logo INR - Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
Abstract:The translation presents Blaustein’s examination of Ingarden’s ontological theory of literary works as developed in Das literarische Kunstwerk (1931). Literary works are analyzed as four-strata structures comprising linguistic sound formations, meaning units, represented objects, and schematized aspects. They are characterized as purely intentional creations with non-independent beings, founded on ideal concepts and subjective operations. The review examines how readers achieve an understanding of literary works and gain access to their ontological foundations. Blaustein discusses epistemological concerns about the accessibility of ideal concepts to readers and addresses the multiplication of metaphysical entities. An alternative approach based on linguistic directives and sentence systems is presented, in order to preserve intersubjective identity without metaphysical commitments. The study discusses Ingarden’s approach to literary theory, particularly with respect to the multi-stratal structure of literary works, and examines the underlying ontological assumptions.
Keywords:work of art, literary work, ideal concepts, multi-stratal, four-strata theory
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:23.12.2025
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 355-363
Numbering:Letn. 34, št. 134/135
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-25213 New window
UDC:801.73
ISSN on article:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:264549123 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:19.01.2026
Views:359
Downloads:185
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Phainomena
Publisher:Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Nova revija, Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko
ISSN:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:29705216 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0341-2022
Name:Humanistika in smisel humanosti v vidikih zgodovinskosti in sodobnosti

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:I0-0036-2022
Name:Center za promocijo humanistike Inštituta Nove revije

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Ocena Ingardnovega dela Literarna umetnina
Abstract:Blaustein ocenjuje publikaciji spod peresa dveh predstavnikov lvovsko-varšavske šole: O pomenu izrazov (1931) Kazimierza Ajdukiewicza in Gnoseologija: Znanstveni pristop k teoriji vednosti (1929) Tadeusza Kotarbińskega. Prikaz Ajdukiewiczevega dela se osredotoča na semantično teorijo, ki jo pisec razvija s pomočjo razgrnitve motivacijskih odnosov med stavki, jezikovnih smernic in predpostavljenih substitucijskih odnosov. Blausteinova analiza zadeva razlikovanje med verbalno in intuitivno izpeljavo, disponiranost glede jezika in definicijo sinonimije na podlagi predpostavljene substitutivnosti. Pri obravnavi dela Kotarbińskega Blaustein analizira integracijo reistične ontologije z epistemološkim realizmom na področjih semantične teorije, epistemologije, formalne logike in znanstvene metodologije. Oceni se dotikata tako teoretskih prispevkov kot metodoloških pristopov obeh avtorjev. Obenem identificirata določene omejitve glede metafizičnih domnev in glede uporabnosti onkraj formalnih logičnih sistemov.
Keywords:umetnina, literarno delo, idealna pojmovanja, večplastnost, teorija štirih plasti


Back