Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Gemeinschaft als Denkform : Wie man Kant mit Fink, Nancy und Esposito sozialphilosophisch wendet
Authors:ID Boelderl, Artur R. (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (361,61 KB)
MD5: 7E55F789DE934D3819AE59413AC682EC
 
Language:German
Typology:1.02 - Review Article
Organization:Logo INR - Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
Abstract:Community as a Form of Thinking. How One Turns Kant Towards Social Philosophy with Fink, Nancy, and Esposito In the times of nihilism, it is necessary to recall, with Roberto Esposito, the fact that, strictly speaking, in philosophy and its history, there is no other subject than community, insofar as everything that becomes the subject of philosophy can only become so because of the fact that there is community. That communality is a form of thinking or that the latter is constitutively communal, is another way of expressing what Emmanuel Levinas once put in the more succinct phrase that in consciousness one is always in two, even if one is alone. In order to explain the implications of this, I draw a line in my essay from Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (specifically, its “positive” definition of being as “merely the position of a thing” [B 626], which receives much less attention than its negative aspect emphasized in the same passage, according to which being is not a real predicate) to the readings of Kant by Eugen Fink, Jean-Luc Nancy, and the aforementioned Roberto Esposito, in order to arrive at an understanding of being as an exposition of the disposition of things in us, i.e., as community.
Keywords:social philosophy, community, Immanuel Kant, categorical imperative, co-existence
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:26.12.2023
Year of publishing:2023
Number of pages:str. 41-75
Numbering:Letn. 32, št. 126/127
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-20593 New window
UDC:1 Esposito:316.3
ISSN on article:1318-3362
DOI:10.32022/PHI32.2023.126-127.3 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:179302915 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:23.10.2024
Views:100
Downloads:38
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Phainomena
Publisher:Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Nova revija, Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko
ISSN:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:29705216 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Skupnost kot miselna forma : Kako s Finkom, Nancyjem in Espositom socialnofilozofsko zaobrniti Kanta
Abstract:V dobi nihilizma se z Robertom Espositom morda velja spomniti dejstva, da znotraj filozofije in njene zgodovine v strogem smislu ni nikakršne druge téme kakor skupnosti, kolikor lahko vse, kar je filozofska téma, postane takšno samó zaradi okoliščine, da skupnost obstaja. Da je skupnostnost forma mišljenja oziroma da je slednje konstitutivno skupnostno, je samo drug način, kakor izraziti tisto, kar je Emmanuel Levinas nekoč strnil v pomenljivo formulacijo: v zavesti je vsakdo vedno v dvoje, četudi je sam. Z namenom razjasnitve daljnosežnosti omenjene okoliščine v prispevku potegnem povezavo od Kantove Kritike čistega uma (in sicer, konkretno, od tamkaj zastavljene »pozitivne« definicije biti kot »zgolj pozicije neke reči« [B 626], ki je precej redkeje obravnavana kakor na istem mestu poudarjeni negativni aspekt, glede na katerega bit ni noben realen predikat) do interpretacij Kanta pri Eugenu Finku, Jeanu-Lucu Nancyju in Robertu Espositu, da bi tako prispel do razumevanja biti kot expozicije dispozicije reči v nas, se pravi, kot skupnosti.
Keywords:socialna filozofija, skupnost, Immanuel Kant, kategorični imperativ, ko-eksistenca


Back