Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Osteoporosis treatment gap : a systematic literature review
Authors:ID Gril Rogina, Kaja (Author)
ID Petravić, Luka (Author)
ID Oikonomidis, Christos (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/sjph-2026-0022
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (1,10 MB)
MD5: B17715DEA46CA1C158A240FCBCFF2E24
 
Language:English
Typology:1.02 - Review Article
Organization:Logo NIJZ - National Institute of Public Health
Abstract:Introduction: Osteoporosis is a common metabolic bone disease that increases fracture risk, particularly among older adults, and imposes a substantial global burden. Despite advances in risk assessment and treatment, a large treatment gap remains, with many high-risk individuals not receiving care. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of English-language studies published up to April 2025, identified through searches in multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Europe PMC). 43 studies were included. Due to the heterogeneity of study designs and treatment gap definitions, a narrative thematic synthesis was performed. Results: Reported treatment gap estimates varied widely (38.8–94.6%) across countries and study populations. Lower treatment rates were associated with patient factors (male sex, lower socio-economic status, comorbidities) and healthcare system factors (limited physician awareness, institutional barriers, poor interprofessional communication). Higher treatment rates were associated with older age, family history of osteoporosis, prior diagnosis or bone mineral density testing, and participation in structured care programmes. Conclusions: Substantial global treatment gaps in osteoporosis care persist, particularly following fragility fractures. These gaps arise from multiple patient, physician, and system-level factors, with persistent disparities by sex, ethnicity, comorbidities, and socio-economic status. Findings highlight the need for standardised definitions of the treatment gap and suggest areas for future research and intervention development.
Keywords:osteoporosis, fragility fractures, healthcare disparities, treatment gap, care gap
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Submitted for review:30.10.2026
Article acceptance date:03.06.2026
Publication date:01.09.2026
Year of publishing:2026
Number of pages:str. 184-196
Numbering:Letn. 65, št. 3
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-32312 New window
UDC:614
ISSN on article:0351-0026
DOI:10.2478/sjph-2026-0022 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:289761795 New window
Note:Besedilo v angl.;
Pub. date in DiRROS:04.09.2026
Views:25
Downloads:13
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Slovenian journal of public health
Publisher:Zavod LRS za zdravstveno varstvo, Republiški zdravstveni center, Zavod LRS za zdravstveno varstvo, Republiški zdravstveni center, Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje, Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije, Univerzitetni zavod za zdravstveno in socialno varstvo
ISSN:0351-0026
COBISS.SI-ID:3287810 New window

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Vrzel v zdravljenju osteoporoze - sistematični pregled literature
Abstract:Uvod: Osteoporoza je pogosta presnovna bolezen kosti, ki povečuje tveganje za zlome, zlasti pri starejših odraslih, in predstavlja pomembno globalno zdravstveno breme. Kljub napredku pri oceni tveganja za zlome in razpoložljivosti učinkovitih možnosti zdravljenja, vrzel v zdravljenju osteoporoze vztraja, saj številni posamezniki z visokim tveganjem, predvsem starostniki, ne prejemajo ustrezne oskrbe. Namen tega sistematičnega pregleda je kategorizirati vzroke za vrzel v zdravljenju osteoporoze. Metode: Opravili smo sistematični pregled študij v angleškem jeziku, objavljenih do aprila 2025 v podatkovnih bazah PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Europe PMC. V analizo je bilo vključenih 43 študij. Zaradi heterogenosti zasnove študij in definicij vrzeli je bila izvedena narativna tematska sinteza. Rezultati: Ocene vrzeli v zdravljenju se med državami in okolji gibljejo med 38,8 % in 94,6 %. Dejavniki, povezani z nižjimi stopnjami zdravljenja, vključujejo moški spol, nižji socialno-ekonomski status, določene pridružene bolezni, pa tudi dejavnike, povezane z zdravstvenim sistemom, kot so pomanjkanje ozaveščenosti pri zdravnikih, institucionalne ovire ter nezadostno medpoklicno sodelovanje. Višje stopnje zdravljenja so povezane s starostjo, družinsko anamnezo osteoporoze, predhodno diagnozo ali meritvijo kostne gostote ter učinkovito usklajeno oskrbo v okviru specializiranih programov. Zaključki: Kljub učinkovitim diagnostičnim in terapevtskim možnostim po vsem svetu, vrzel v zdravljenju osteoporoze vztraja, zlasti pri ljudeh po zlomu. Ta vrzel izvira iz dejavnikov na ravni bolnika, zdravstvenih delavcev in zdravstvenega sistema ter se kaže v doslednih razlikah glede spola, etnične pripadnosti, pridruženih bolezni in socialno-ekonomskega položaja. Reševanje teh izzivov bo zahtevalo integrirane poti oskrbe, izboljšano klinično izobraževanje in razvoj modelov za usklajeno obravnavo po zlomu.
Keywords:osteoporoza, osteoporotični zlomi, vrzeli v zdravljenju, neenakosti v obravnavi


Back