Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Evaluation of discontinuation for adverse events of JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs in an international collaboration of rheumatoid arthritis registers (the 'JAK-pot' study)
Authors:ID Aymon, Romain (Author)
ID Mongin, Denis (Author)
ID Bergstra, Sytske Anne (Author)
ID Choquette, Denis (Author)
ID Codreanu, Catalin (Author)
ID De Cock, Diederik (Author)
ID Dreyer, Lene (Author)
ID Elkayam, Ori (Author)
ID Huschek, Doreen (Author)
ID Rotar, Žiga (Author), et al.
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (1,01 MB)
MD5: A5E1025D2688220EB5186DFBE7616E92
 
URL URL - Source URL, visit https://ard.eular.org/article/S0003-4967(24)00052-9/fulltext
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo UKC LJ - Ljubljana University Medical Centre
Abstract:Background: In a clinical trial setting, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) taking the Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) tofacitinib demonstrated higher adverse events rates compared with those taking the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) adalimumab or etanercept. Objective: Compare treatment discontinuations for adverse events (AEs) among second-line therapies in an international real-world RA population. Methods: Patients initiating JAKi, TNFi or a biological with another mode of action (OMA) from 17 registers participating in the 'JAK-pot' collaboration were included. The primary outcome was the rate of treatment discontinuation due to AEs. We used unadjusted and adjusted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models to compare treatment discontinuations for AEs among treatment groups by class, but also evaluating separately the specific type of JAKi. Results: Of the 46 913 treatment courses included, 12 523 were JAKi (43% baricitinib, 40% tofacitinib, 15% upadacitinib, 2% filgotinib), 23 391 TNFi and 10 999 OMA. The adjusted cause-specific hazard rate of treatment discontinuation for AEs was similar for TNFi versus JAKi (1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10) and higher for OMA versus JAKi (1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23), lower with TNFi compared with tofacitinib (0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.90), but higher for TNFi versus baricitinib (1.15, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.30) and lower for TNFi versus JAKi in patients 65 or older with at least one cardiovascular risk factor (0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.97). Conclusion: While JAKi overall were not associated with more treatment discontinuations for AEs, subgroup analyses suggest varying patterns with specific JAKi, such as tofacitinib, compared with TNFi. However, these observations should be interpreted cautiously, given the observational study design.
Keywords:antirheumatic agents, arthritis, rheumatoid, biological therapy, epidemiology
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2023
Number of pages:str. 1-8
Numbering:Vol. , iss. [article no.] 224670
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-32153 New window
UDC:616-002
ISSN on article:1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard-2023-224670 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:177876227 New window
Note:Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis z dne 18. 12. 2023;
Pub. date in DiRROS:28.08.2026
Views:109
Downloads:81
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:eARD
Shortened title:eARD
Publisher:BMJ Publishing
ISSN:1468-2060
COBISS.SI-ID:30934573 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
Project number:MZ00023728023728
Name:/

Licences

License:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:antirevmatična sredstva, artiritis, revmatoidni, biološka terapija, epidemiologija


Back