Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Emergency and prophylactic uterine artery embolization in gynecology and obstetrics - a retrospective analysis
Authors:ID Vihtelič, Polona (Author)
ID Skuk, Eva (Author)
ID Kenda Šuster, Nataša (Author)
ID Jakimovska, Marina (Author)
ID Popović, Peter (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/raon-2024-0037
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (780,89 KB)
MD5: 30ECD5421887A7775F1F0A126AAE2772
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo DRO - Association of Radiology and Oncology
Abstract:Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of emergency and prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) in our clinical practice, including technical success, clinical success, and associated complications. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 64 women who underwent emergency (n =18) and prophylactic (n = 46) UAE. Indications for emergency UAE included postpartum hemorrhage or severe hemorrhage during pregnancy termination, while prophylactic UAE was performed prior to surgical removal of retained products of conception (RPOC), delivery with abnormal placental implantation, or pregnancy termination (cervical pregnancy or fetal anomalies accompanied by abnormal placental implantation). Technical success of UAE was defined as complete exclusion of the vascular lesion and contrast stasis on the final angiogram, while clinical success was defined as cessation of bleeding after UAE Termination without a hysterectomy. Results: The overall clinical success of UAE in our study was 97% (62/64). All embolization procedures were technically and clinically successful in the prophylactic group without life-threatening hemorrhages or hysterectomies (100% success rate, 46/46). However, while 100% technical success was similarly attained in the emergency group, bleeding was successfully controlled in 89% of cases (16/18). In two patients with significant blood loss (over 2000 mL), embolization failed to achieve hemostasis, resulting in persistent bleeding and subsequent hysterectomy. Conclusions: UAE is a safe and effective procedure for managing primary postpartum hemorrhage or severe hemorrhage during pregnancy termination and for decreasing the risk of severe hemorrhage during surgical removal of RPOC, delivery with abnormal placental implantation, or pregnancy.
Keywords:endovascular treatment, fertility, hysterectomy, postpartum hemorrhage
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.09.2024
Publisher:Association of Radiology and Oncology
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:str. 397-405, IX
Numbering:Vol. 58, no. 3
Source:Ljubljana
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-30458 New window
UDC:61
ISSN on article:1318-2099
DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0037 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:209319939 New window
Note:Soavtorji: Eva Skuk, Natasa Kenda Suster, Marina Jakimovska Stefanovska , Peter Popovic;
Publication date in DiRROS:26.06.2026
Views:55
Downloads:49
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Radiology and oncology
Shortened title:Radiol. oncol.
Publisher:Slovenian Medical Society - Section of Radiology, Croatian Medical Association - Croatian Society of Radiology
ISSN:1318-2099
COBISS.SI-ID:32649472 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Nujna in preventivna embolizacija maternične arterije v ginekologiji in porodništvu


Back