| Title: | Long-term outcome of multilayer flow modulator in aortic aneurysms |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Pintarić, Karlo (Author) ID Boltežar, Lučka (Author) ID Umek, Nejc (Author) ID Kuhelj, Dimitrij (Author) |
| Files: | PDF - Presentation file, download (605,81 KB) MD5: DC5F0492747988254179D4CF527C56D4
URL - Source URL, visit https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/raon-2024-0021?tab=abstract
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | DRO - Association of Radiology and Oncology
|
|---|
| Abstract: | ckground. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy of endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modu-lators (MFMs) for treating aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients unsuitable for conventional treatments.Patients and methods. Conducted from 2011 to 2019 at a single center, this retrospective observational study in-cluded 17 patients who underwent endovascular treatment with MFMs. These patients were selected based on theirunsuitability for traditional surgical or endovascular procedures. The study involved meticulous pre-procedural plan-ning, precise implantation of MFMs, and follow-up using CT angiography. The primary focus was on volumetric andflow volume changes in aneurysms, along with traditional diameter measurements. Moreover, the technical successand post-procedural complications were also registered.Results. The technical success rate was 100%, and 30-day procedural complication rate was 17.6%. Post-treatmentassessments revealed that 11 out of 17 patients showed a decrease in flow volume within the aneurysm sac, indicativeof a favorable hemodynamic response. The median decrease in flow volume was 12 ml, with a median relative de-crease of 8%. However, there was no consistent reduction in aneurysm size; most aneurysms demonstrated a medianincrease in volume for 46 ml and median increase in diameter for 18 mm.Conclusions. While MFMs offer a potential alternative for high-risk aortic aneurysm patients, their effectiveness in pre-venting aneurysm expansion is limited. The results suggest that MFMs can provide a stable hemodynamic environmentbut do not reliably reduce aneurysm size. This underscores the need for ongoing vigilance and long-term monitoringin patients treated with this technology |
|---|
| Keywords: | multilayer flow modulator, aortic aneurism, long-term follow up, volumetric measurements |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Publication date: | 01.06.2024 |
|---|
| Publisher: | Association of Radiology and Oncology |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2024 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 206-213 , V |
|---|
| Numbering: | Vol. 58, no. 2 |
|---|
| Source: | Ljubljana |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DiRROS-30454  |
|---|
| UDC: | 616-006 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1318-2099 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.2478/raon-2024-0021  |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 195722755  |
|---|
| Note: | Soavtorji: Lucka Boltezar, Nejc Umek, Dimitrij Kuhelj;
|
|---|
| Publication date in DiRROS: | 26.06.2026 |
|---|
| Views: | 167 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 128 |
|---|
| Metadata: |  |
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |