Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Freud and Science
Authors:ID Nassif, Jacques (Author)
ID Rasmussen, Holden M. (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/15148
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (142,51 KB)
MD5: BF1DE2A27E9BD7D6095478367A9C95CC
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo ZRC SAZU - The Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Abstract:This article is a translation of Jacques Nassif’s 1968 article “Freud et la science,” which appeared in Cahiers pour l’Analyse. Nassif assesses the compatibility of the psychoanalytic theory of repetition with the concept of the epistemological break. If epistemological breaks are ruptures with the past, then how does that apply in the case of psychoanalysis as both a general science and a clinical practice? As Nassif notes, the concept of repetition is fundamental to both registers of psychoanalysis: as a behavior outside the clinic and as an instrumental phenomenon within the clinic. Given the fundamentality of repetition, what is the status of the break in the field and function of psychoanalysis? Nassif’s answer is that psychoanalysis breaks with the past by virtue of a repetition of a previous series of breaks in the psychological sciences. This series of breaks appears across the works of Jean-Martin Charcot, John Hughlings Jackson, Hippolyte Bernheim, and Josef Breuer. After a close-reading of Freud’s engagement with Charcot’s work, an examination of his tutelage under Charcot, and an assessment of the novelty of Charcot’s methods and theories, Nassif suggests that epistemological breaks imply a subsequent “repetition of the break” [répétition de coupure]. However, how Freud makes his own inaugural break through the repetition of a previous series of breaks remains to be elucidated. Nassif’s article thus attempts to “repeat” the origins of psychoanalysis, and to shed light on the applicability of the notion of the epistemological break in contested “sciences,” like Marxism and psychoanalysis. The article ends with a note that a sequel is to follow. Nassif later incorporated the material from this article into his major 1977 book Freud, l’inconscient.
Keywords:Jean-Martin Charcot, epistemological break, Sigmund Freud, philosophy of science, psychoanalysis, repetition
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:13.03.2026
Year of publishing:2025
Numbering:letn. 46, št. 3
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-28426 New window
ISSN on article:0353-4510
DOI:10.3986/fv.46.3.02 New window
Copyright:Imetniki avtorskih pravic na prispevkih so avtorji
Publication date in DiRROS:18.03.2026
Views:19
Downloads:9
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Filozofski vestnik
Shortened title:Filoz. vestn.
Publisher:Filozofski inštitut ZRC SAZU
ISSN:0353-4510
COBISS.SI-ID:8558080 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.
Licensing start date:13.03.2026
Applies to:VoR

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Freud in znanost
Abstract:To besedilo je prevod članka Jacquesa Nassifa »Freud et la science«, ki je bil leta 1968 objavljen v Cahiers pour l’Analyse. Avtor v njem preučuje združljivost psihoanalitične teorije ponavljanja s konceptom epistemološkega preloma. Če so epistemološki prelomi prekinitve s preteklostjo, kako torej to velja za psihoanalizo kot znanost in kot klinično prakso? Kot poudarja Nassif, je pojem ponavljanja temeljnega pomena za oba registra psihoanalize: kot vedênje zunaj klinike in kot instrumentalni pojav znotraj nje. Kakšen je, upoštevaje temeljni značaj ponavljanja, status preloma v polju in funkciji psihoanalize? Nassifov odgovor je, da psihoanaliza s preteklostjo prelamlja na način, da ponovi predhodno serijo prelomov v psiholoških znanostih. Ta serija prelomov se pojavi v delih Jean-Martina Charcota, Johna Hughlingsa Jacksona, Hippolyta Bernheima in Josefa Breuerja. Po natančnem branju Freudovega ukvarjanja s Charcotovim delom, pregledu njegovega izobraževanja pri Charcotu in ovrednotenju novosti Charcotovih metod in teorij Nassif ugotavlja, da epistemološki prelomi implicirajo kasnejšo »ponovitev preloma « [répétition de coupure]. Odprto pa pri tem ostaja vprašanje, kako Freud izvede svoj lastni izhodiščni prelom prek ponovitve predhodne serije prelomov. Nassifov članek zato poskuša »ponoviti« izvor psihoanalize in osvetliti uporabnost pojma epistemološkega preloma v spornih »znanostih«, kot sta marksizem in psihoanaliza. Članek se zaključi z opombo, da bo sledilo nadaljevanje. Nassif je pozneje gradivo iz tega članka vključil v svoje osrednje delo Freud, l’inconscient (1977).
Keywords:Jean-Martin Charcot, epistemološki prelom, Sigmund Freud, filozofija znanosti, psihoa-naliza, ponavljanje


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Filozofski vestnik

Back