Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Choice of Neurosis : Charcot and Freud
Authors:ID Troha, Tadej (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/15151
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (121,34 KB)
MD5: 76C54BA33996AF5F2A579F9F3D8AE10B
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo ZRC SAZU - The Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Abstract:The article approaches Freud’s concept of the choice of neurosis (Neurosenwahl) through Jacques Nassif’s 1968 essay “Freud and Science.” In this text, Nassif focuses on the ways in which Jean-Martin Charcot influenced the development of Freud’s thought, highlighting in particular Charcot’s decisive gesture of isolating neurosis as a purely psychological affection. The article accordingly proceeds from the hypothesis that the repetition of the break—which Nassif identifies as the central methodological gesture of psychoanalysis— takes place here in the form of a repetition and radicalization of Charcot’s “choice of neurosis.” In other words, the problem of the choice of neurosis could be posed only on the basis of Charcot’s prior gesture, and if Freud wished to remain faithful to this gesture, he had to articulate the choice of neurosis as a speculative, metapsychological concept. The article shows that the choice of neurosis functions as a nodal point between empiricism, psychoanalytic technique, and metapsychological speculation, and, on another level, between ontogenetic and phylogenetic approaches: a constellation that becomes particularly clear in the analysis of the initially lost and later rediscovered twelfth and final metapsychological essay, “Overview of the Transference Neuroses.”
Keywords:Sigmund Freud, Jacques Nassif, metapsychology, choice of neurosis, disposition
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:13.03.2026
Year of publishing:2025
Numbering:letn. 46, št. 3
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-28423 New window
ISSN on article:0353-4510
DOI:10.3986/fv.46.3.05 New window
Copyright:Imetniki avtorskih pravic na prispevkih so avtorji
Publication date in DiRROS:18.03.2026
Views:24
Downloads:9
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Filozofski vestnik
Shortened title:Filoz. vestn.
Publisher:Filozofski inštitut ZRC SAZU
ISSN:0353-4510
COBISS.SI-ID:8558080 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0014
Name:Pogoji in problemi sodobne filozofije

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:N6-0286
Name:Realnost, iluzija, fikcija, resnica: preliminarna študija

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J6-4623
Name:AKonceptualizacija konca: njegova temporalnost, dialektika in afektivna dimenzija

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.
Licensing start date:13.03.2026
Applies to:VoR

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Izbira nevroze : Charcot in Freud
Abstract:Članek se v obravnavi Freudovega koncepta izbire nevroze, Neurosenwahl, opre na spis Jacquesa Nassifa »Freud in znanost« iz leta 1968. V njem se Nassif osredotoča na načine, kako je na razvoj Freudove misli vplival Jean-Martin Charcot, pri čemer posebej izpostavi prelomno gesto osredotočenja na nevrozo kot čisto psihološko afekcijo. Članek posledično izhaja iz hipoteze, da je ponovitev preloma, ki ga Nassif postavi kot osrednji metodološki prijem psihoanalize, v tem primeru potekala kot ponovitev in zaostritev Charcotove »izbire nevroze«; problem izbire nevroze se je, drugače rečeno, lahko postavil zgolj na podlagi predhodne Charcotove geste, in če je Freud želel tej gesti ostati zvest, je izbiro nevroze moral oblikovati kot spekulativni, metapsihološki koncept. Prispevek pokaže, da izbira nevroze zavzame vlogo vozlišča med empirijo, psihoanalitično tehniko in metapsihološko spekulacijo, na drugi ravni pa tudi med ontogenetskim in filogenetskim pristopom, kar je še posebej razvidno iz analize sprva izgubljenega in kasneje najdenega sklepnega metapsihološkega spisa »Pregled transfernih nevroz«.
Keywords:Sigmund Freud, Jacques Nassif, metapsihologija, izbira nevroze, dispozicija


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Filozofski vestnik

Back