Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Specialist training in infectious diseases in Europe
Authors:ID Salmanton-García, Jon (Author)
ID Guerra Maio, António (Author)
ID Stahl, Jean Paul (Author)
ID Barra, Eoghan de (Author)
ID Jensen-Fangel, Søren (Author)
ID Torti, Carlo (Author)
ID Kraef, Christian (Author)
ID Miro, Jose M. (Author)
ID Verbon, Annelies (Author)
ID Cornely, Oliver (Author)
ID Beović, Bojana (Research coworker), et al.
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (1009,84 KB)
MD5: 86CAC0947B5E046F68FC52EDE9D71E56
 
URL URL - Source URL, visit https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1198-743X%2824%2900614-1
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo UKC LJ - Ljubljana University Medical Centre
Abstract:Objectives: The objectives were to determine the structure of training programmes and assessment of physicians training to become infectious disease (ID) specialists in Europe in early 2024 and to document the provision of specialists, trainees and training centres in each country. Methods: Delegates to the ID Section and Board of the European Union of Medical Specialists entered national data on a web-based survey tool in late 2023eearly 2024. Results were compared with European Union of Medical Specialists recommendations on the structure and content of postgraduate training in ID in Europe (2018), and to results of a similar survey in early 2021. Results: Responses were received from all 35 countries; 27/35 (77%) recognize ID as an independent speciality and 7/35 (20%) as a subspeciality. Spain does not officially recognize the speciality. In Cyprus, Iceland, and Luxembourg, despite official recognition of the sub-/speciality, ID training must be completed abroad. Paediatric ID was recognized in 16/35 (46%) countries. The number of adult ID specialists varied from 78.8 per million inhabitants in Sweden to 0.6 in Germany. Only 7/31 (23%) national programmes provide the minimum recommended 6 months of training in medical microbiology. Assessment methods included logbooks/portfolios in 25/31 (81%), final examinations in 25/31 (81%) and workplace-based assessments in 21/31 (68%). Discussion: There has been little change since 2021 in speciality status or in structure and content of training programmes across Europe. There have been large increases in training position numbers in several countries, possibly in response to COVID-19. Continued low compliance with the 2018 recommendations to increase exposure to medical microbiology during training highlights the slow pace of change. Logistic barriers to change and to harmonization across Europe remain and are discussed in the context of published concerns of trainees.
Keywords:evaluation mechanisms, infectious diseases, medical education, preparedness, specialization, training programmes
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 1003-1010
Numbering:Vol. 31, iss. 6
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-28061 New window
UDC:616.9
ISSN on article:1198-743X
DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.12.026 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:238015491 New window
Note:
Publication date in DiRROS:09.03.2026
Views:200
Downloads:130
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European society of clinical microbiology and infectious dieseases
Publisher:Decker Europe
ISSN:1198-743X
COBISS.SI-ID:71154 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Back