Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Sex : trouble
Authors:ID Hatch, Ryan Anthony (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/15067/12846
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (144,98 KB)
MD5: AA9A54FFA23CBEF3107E10172FA0A64A
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo ZRC SAZU - The Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Abstract:This essay sets out from the observation that, by and large, the Lacanian field has tended to celebrate Joan Copjec’s “Sex and the Euthanasia of Reason” at the expense of rigorously engaging with it. Indeed, Copjec’s explosive text has often been taken—wrongly—as warranting both an indiscriminate dismissal of the entire project of queer theory (especially where it contests psychoanalytic theorizations of sexual difference) and the frequent confusion of transphobic countertransference with psychoanalytic thinking. Moving against this tendency, “Sex: Trouble” disencumbers the queer- and trans-emancipatory kernel of Copjec’s argument—that is, that sex serves no other purpose than to serve no purpose—from the dimorphic and sometimes “cisnormative” terms through which this radical kernel is at once elaborated and undermined. Setting “Sex and the Euthanasia of Reason” in dialogue with a number of queer and trans theorists, “Sex: Trouble” establishes Copjec’s thought as an indispensable weapon in the struggle against the profusion of meanings that threaten to obliterate the negativity, the nothing, that sex is, and on which the freedom of queer and trans (read: all) subjects is staked.
Keywords:queer, trans, sexual difference, gender, negativity
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:08.01.2026
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 203-228
Numbering:letn. 46, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-27442 New window
UDC:159.964.26:316.367
ISSN on article:0353-4510
DOI:10.3986/fv.46.2.09 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:266685443 New window
Copyright:Imetniki avtorskih pravic na prispevkih so avtorji
Publication date in DiRROS:07.02.2026
Views:110
Downloads:64
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Filozofski vestnik
Shortened title:Filoz. vestn.
Publisher:Filozofski inštitut ZRC SAZU
ISSN:0353-4510
COBISS.SI-ID:8558080 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.
Licensing start date:08.01.2026
Applies to:VoR

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Spol : težava
Abstract:Esej izhaja iz opazke, da je lacanovsko polje na splošno slavilo poglavje »Spol in evtanazija uma« iz knjige Joan Copjec Read My Desire na račun tega, da se ni zares strogo ukvarjalo z njim. Copjecino eksplozivno besedilo je bilo namreč pogosto – napačno – razumljeno kot opravičilo za brezpogojno zavračanje celotnega projekta kvir teorije (zlasti tam, kjer ta nasprotuje psihoanalitičnim teoretizacijam spolne razlike) in za pogosto pomešanje transfobnega kontratransferja s psihoanalitičnim mišljenjem. V nasprotju s to tendenco pričujoče besedilo osvobaja kvir in transemancipacijsko jedro Copjecinega argumenta – namreč, da je edina stvar, ki ji seks služi, ta, da ne služi ničemur – od dimorfnih in včasih »cisnormativnih« izrazov, skozi katere je to radikalno jedro hkrati razdelano in spodkopano. Pričujoče besedilo postavi »Spol in evtanazijo uma« v dialog z več kvir in trans teoretiki, s čimer Copjecino misel uveljavlja kot nepogrešljivo orožje v boju proti obilici pomenov, ki grozijo, da bodo izbrisali negativnost, ta nič, ki je spol, in na katerem temelji svoboda kvir in trans (beri: vseh) subjektov.
Keywords:kvir, trans, spolna razlika, spol, negativnost


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Filozofski vestnik

Back