Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Minus One, or the mismeasure of man : sartorial superegoism and the ethics of unruliness
Authors:ID Sbriglia, Russell (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/15063/12840
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (471,45 KB)
MD5: 1504127D8FCFCA4A6A126E9CBEF15E08
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo ZRC SAZU - The Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Abstract:This essay looks at chapter 4 of Joan Copjec’s Read My Desire, “The Sartorial Super ego,” in order to advance its critique of racism as a form of perversion that posits the racial other as a superegoic Other thought to harbor an obscene enjoyment or “will to jouissance.” While other chapters of Read My Desire have played a pivotal role in shaping Lacanian theory over the past thirty years—especially Lacanian film theory (“Locked Room/Lonely Room”) and Lacanian sex theory (“Sex and the Euthanasia of Reason”)—“The Sartorial Superego” has yet to receive the attention it deserves for the contribution it makes not only to Lacanian race theory, but also to Lacanian ethics more generally. Aiming to redress this oversight, the essay first rehearses, so as to bring into better relief, Copjec’s critique of the perverse “sartorial superegoism” at work in a series of photographs of cloth-donned colonial others taken by famed French psychologist G. G. de Clérambault. It then applies Copjec’s analysis of Clérambault’s sartorial superegoism to more recent, far more sadistic, instances of sartorial superegoic violence perpetrated against postcolonial others in the wake of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001. In so doing, the essay demonstrates that properly grasping both the prescience of and the urgency behind Read My Desire’s concluding call for “another logic of the superego [to] commence” requires reckoning with “The Sartorial Superego.”
Keywords:Joan Copjec, Jacques Lacan, ethics of psychoanalysis, superego, perversion, fantasy, racism
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:08.01.2026
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 115-140
Numbering:letn. 46, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-27438 New window
UDC:159.964.26:17
ISSN on article:0353-4510
DOI:10.3986/fv.46.2.05 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:266616835 New window
Copyright:Imetniki avtorskih pravic na prispevkih so avtorji
Publication date in DiRROS:07.02.2026
Views:102
Downloads:46
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Filozofski vestnik
Shortened title:Filoz. vestn.
Publisher:Filozofski inštitut ZRC SAZU
ISSN:0353-4510
COBISS.SI-ID:8558080 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.
Licensing start date:08.01.2026
Applies to:VoR

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Minus ena ali Človeška napačna mera : krojaško nadjazovstvo in etika neposlušnosti
Abstract:Ta članek obravnava četrto poglavje knjige Joan Copjec Read My Desire, »Krojaški nadjaz«, da bi, izhajajoč iz te obravnave, nadalje razvil kritiko rasizma kot oblike perverzije, ki rasnega drugega postavlja kot nadjazovskega Drugega, za katerega se domneva, da skriva obsceni užitek oziroma »voljo do užitka«. Medtem ko so druga poglavja knjige Read My Desire v zadnjih tridesetih letih odigrala ključno vlogo pri oblikovanju Lacanove teorije – zlasti lacanovske filmske teorije (»Zaklenjena soba/Osamljena soba«) in lacanovske teorije seksualnosti (»Spol in evtanazija uma«) –, pa poglavje »Krojaški nadjaz« še ni bilo deležno pozornosti, ki si jo zasluži za prispevek ne le k Lacanovi teoriji rase, ampak tudi k Lacanovi etiki na splošno. Da bi to pomanjkljivost odpravil, članek najprej ponovi Copjecino kritiko perverznega »krojaškega nadjaza«, ki se kaže v seriji fotografij kolonialnih drugih v oblačilih, ki jih je posnel znani francoski psiholog G. G. de Clérambault. Nato Copjecino analizo Clérambaultovega krojaškega nadjaza uporabi na novejših, veliko bolj sadističnih primerih krojaškega, nadjazovskega nasilja nad postkolonialnimi drugimi po napadih na Svetovni trgovinski center in Pentagon 11. septembra 2001. S tem esej dokazuje, da je za pravilno razumevanje predvidevanja in nujnosti sklepnega poziva knjige Read My Desire k »neki drugi logiki nadjaza« treba upoštevati »krojaški nadjaz«.
Keywords:Joan Copjec, Jacques Lacan, etika psihoanalize, nadjaz, perverzija, fantazma, rasizem


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Filozofski vestnik

Back