Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Kaj študente zdravstvene nege motivira za učenje in kako ocenjujejo simulirano klinično usposabljanje
Authors:ID Pajnič, Manca (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit http://www.obzornikzdravstvenenege.si/2016.50.2.126
 
URL URL - Source URL, visit http://dx.doi.org/10.14528/snr.2016.50.2.86
 
Language:Slovenian
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo ZZBNS - ZSDMSBZTS - Nurses and Midwives Association of Slovenia
Abstract:Uvod: Način in organiziranost študija, dostopnost do gradiv, odnos do študentov in študijska klima lahko vplivajo na zunanjo motivacijo študentov. Namen raziskave je bil ugotoviti motivacijske dejavnike za študij pri študentih zdravstvene nege in kakšen pomen pripisujejo simuliranemu kliničnemu usposabljanju. Metode: Raziskava je potekala leta 2011 na Zdravstveni fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani. Uporabljena je bila opisna kvantitativna metoda dela, podatki so bili zbrani z anketiranjem študentov drugega in tretjega letnika zdravstvene nege. Pri raziskavi je sodelovalo 159 naključno izbranih študentov, uporabili smo strukturiran vprašalnik in petstopenjsko lestvico. Vprašalnik je bil razdeljen na tri sklope: motivacija, zadovoljstvo in stroški študija. Podatki so bili analizirani z opisno in bivariatno statistiko. Rezultati: Želja po pridobivanju dodatnega znanja (x = 4,3) in želja po višji izobrazbi (x = 4,26) sta se najvišje uvrstila na petstopenjski lestvici motivacijskih dejavnikov. Nekaterih negovalnih intervencij študentje na kliničnem usposabljanju še niso imeli možnosti izvesti (x = 3,97), menijo pa, da je bilo v simuliranem kliničnem okolju dovolj časa za izvajanje negovalnih intervencij (x = 1,91). Diskusija in zaključek: Študentje so visoko notranje motivirani za študij zdravstvene nege. Menijo, da je simulirano klinično usposabljanje pomembno za pridobivanje teoretičnih in praktičnih znanj.
Keywords:zdravstvena nega, izobraževanje, mentorstvo, študij, zadovoljstvo, praktične veščine, teoretično znanje, klinično okolje, simulacije
Publication date:01.01.2016
Year of publishing:2016
Number of pages:str. 126-134
Numbering:Letn. 50, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-26862 New window
UDC:378(497.4):616-083
ISSN on article:1318-2951
DOI:10.14528/snr.2016.50.2.86 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:525583129 New window
Note:Besedilo v slov.;
Publication date in DiRROS:28.01.2026
Views:75
Downloads:69
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Obzornik zdravstvene nege : strokovno glasilo Zveze društev medicinskih sester in zdravstvenih tehnikov Slovenije
Shortened title:Obzor. zdrav. neg.
Publisher:Zbornica zdravstvene nege
ISSN:1318-2951
COBISS.SI-ID:39433728 New window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:What motivates nursing students for learning and how they evaluate simulated clinical training
Abstract:Introduction: Mode and organization of the study, availability of learning material attitude towards students and study atmosphere can all have an impact on the extrinsic motivation factors. This research aims to identify the students' motivation factors for study and how they assess obligatory simulated clinical training. Methods: The study was conducted at the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, in the year 2011. The purposive sample consisted of 159 second and third-year nursing students. The data were collected through a structured questionnaire, divided into 3 blocks: motivation, satisfaction, and tuition and living costs and Five-point scale. Descriptive and bivariate statistic methods were used for the analysis of data. Results: The items 'the desire to attain additional knowledge' (x = 4.3) and 'the desire to achieve a higher educational level' (x = 4.26) were rated highest among the intrinsic motivation factors on a 5-point scale. During their clinical training, the students were not given the opportunity to perform certain nursing interventions (x = 3.97), and they claim that in simulated clinical training there was not sufficient time to practice nursing interventions (x = 1.91). Discussion and conclusion: The students are highly motivated for studying nursing. They recognize the positive effects of simulated clinical training on their theoretical and practical knowledge, and academic achievement.
Keywords:nursing care, education, mentorship, study, satisfaction, practical skills, theoretical knowledge, lab training, simulation


Back