Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Pregled publiciranja izbranih bibliografskih enot visokošolskih učiteljev strokovnih predmetov zdravstvene nege : retrospektivna raziskava
Authors:ID Bregar, Branko (Author)
ID Rašić, Jure (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2020.54.3.3008
 
URL URL - Source URL, visit https://obzornik.zbornica-zveza.si/index.php/ObzorZdravNeg/article/view/3008
 
Language:Slovenian
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo ZZBNS - ZSDMSBZTS - Nurses and Midwives Association of Slovenia
Abstract:Uvod: Kakovost študijskih programov je povezana s strokovno in znanstveno usposobljenostjo visokošolskih učiteljev. Namen raziskave je bil pregledati publicistično aktivnost visokošolskih učiteljev izbranih strokovnih predmetov v visokošolskih institucijah za zdravstveno nego v Sloveniji. Metoda: Retrospektivno so bili pregledani javno dostopni podatki o publiciranju 76 visokošolskih učiteljev, nosilcev dvanajstih strokovnih predmetov v sedmih visokošolskih institucijah na področju zdravstvene nege, za obdobje 2010%2015. Podatki so prikazani z opisno statistiko. Rezultati: V prikazanem obdobju je bilo evidentiranih 4.337 enot publiciranja, na enega visokošolskega učitelja povprečno 57,32 (s = 59,05). Od tega je bilo največ mentorstev diplom (n = 2928, 67,30 %), najmanj izvirnih znanstvenih člankov (n = 268, 6,21 %), še manj preglednih znanstvenih člankov (n = 46, 1,10 %). Obstajajo razlike v publiciranju na splošno med fakultetami (x2(2) = 14,272, p = 0,027), pri mentorstvih (x2(2) = 16,767, p = 0,010), preglednih znanstvenih člankih (x2(2) = 28,442, p < 0,001) uredništvih (x2(2) = 17,870, p = 0,007). Diskusija in zaključek: Nosilci strokovnih predmetov zdravstvene nege kažejo različne aktivnosti na področju publiciranja bibliografskih enot. Visokošolske institucije naj spodbujajo visokošolske učitelje k publiciranju ter s tem pospešujejo njihov strokovni in znanstveni razvoj. Publiciranje znanstvenih bibliografskih enot bi bilo smiselno dodati tudi merilom za habilitacijo v naziv predavatelja.
Keywords:zdravstvo, visoko šolstvo, fakultete, kakovost, medicinske sestre
Publication date:01.01.2020
Year of publishing:2020
Number of pages:str. 230-240
Numbering:Letn. 54, št. 3
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-26414 New window
UDC:616-083
ISSN on article:1318-2951
DOI:10.14528/snr.2020.54.3.3008 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:29539587 New window
Note:Besedilo v slov.;
Publication date in DiRROS:28.01.2026
Views:41
Downloads:15
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Obzornik zdravstvene nege : strokovno glasilo Zveze društev medicinskih sester in zdravstvenih tehnikov Slovenije
Shortened title:Obzor. zdrav. neg.
Publisher:Zbornica zdravstvene nege
ISSN:1318-2951
COBISS.SI-ID:39433728 New window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:A review of publishing selected bibliographic units by lecturers of professional subjects in the study programme of nursing : a retrospective study
Abstract:Introduction: The quality of study programmes is related to the academic skills of higher education lecturers. The aim of the research was to examine the publications of lecturers of professional subjects at higher education institutions offering nursing study programmes in Slovenia. Method: Publicly available data of publications by 76 lectures of 12 professional subjects at higher education institutions offering nursing study programmes were retrospectively reviewed for the period from 2010 to 2015. Data are presented with descriptive statistics. Results: 4337 units of publication were published in the period, per one lecturer 57.32 (s = 59.05). The most units were mentoring diploma theses (n = 2928, 67.30%), the lowest number of units comprised the publication of original scientific articles (n = 268, 6.21%), and there were even fewer review articles published (n = 46, 1.10 %). There are significant differences in all published units between faculties (x2(2) = 14.272, p = 0.027), in mentoring (x2(2) = 16.767, p = 0.010), review articles (x2(2) = 28.442, p < 0.001) and editorial units (x2(2) = 17.870, p = 0.007). Discussion and conclusion: The holders of professional nursing subjects engage in various activities in the field of publishing bibliographic units. Higher education institutions should encourage higher education lecturers to publish and thus promote their professional and scientific development. Publication of scientific bibliographic units could be added as one of the criteria for appointment to the titles of higher education teachers including the title of lecturer.
Keywords:health care, higher education, faculties, quality, nurses


Back