| Title: | Comparable rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections between non-tunneled and tunneled hemodialysis catheters : a retrospective single-center study |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Zrimšek, Matej (Author) ID Gubenšek, Jakob (Author) |
| Files: | PDF - Presentation file, download (531,72 KB) MD5: BEA17BC2E5E8662601E85B8EC00F827C
URL - Source URL, visit https://academic.oup.com/ckj/article/19/1/sfaf392/8381221
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | UKC LJ - Ljubljana University Medical Centre
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Background: A hemodialysis catheter may serve as a short- or medium-term vascular access solution. Current guidelines suggest restricting non-tunneled catheter use to 2 weeks, partially based on studies using straight non-tunneled jugular catheters, which have now been widely replaced with pre-curved catheters. We compared the rate of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSIs) and possible CRBSIs (PCRBSIs) of pre-curved non-tunneled and tunneled catheters in our hemodialysis center. Methods: This was a retrospective study including patients dialyzed on an outpatient basis between 1 January 2018 and 1 July 2024, with a follow-up until 1 March 2025. The primary aim was to compare the rates of CRBSIs. Results: In 301 patients, 625 non-tunneled single lumen catheter pairs and 53 double lumen tunneled catheters were used. There were 53 CRBSIs in non-tunneled and 10 in tunneled catheters, with identical incidence rate (0.48/1000 catheter-days in both groups). Analyzing CRBSIs and PCRBSIs together also showed similar infection rates [0.66 vs 0.58, incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence interval 1.14 (0.6–2.1), P = .68]. Two subanalyses were made: CRBSI IRR in 27 patients with both types of catheters during study period was 1.37 (0.55–3.41, P = .49) and 2.01 (0.52–7.72, P = .47) in 36 patients after their first CRBSI. Time to CRBSI was also comparable in all analyses. Conclusions: Our study found no significant difference in the incidence of CRBSIs. We conclude that prolonged use of non-tunneled pre-curved catheters, which are easily managed, is a viable option for patients awaiting construction of arteriovenous fistula, insertion of a peritoneal catheter or kidney transplantation in a reasonable time. Promising results on long-term use from this study need to be confirmed in prospective studies. |
|---|
| Keywords: | catheter-related blood stream infection, chronic hemodialysis, hemodialysis catheter, pre-curved jugular non-tunneled catheters, tunneled hemodialysis catheters |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2026 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 1-8 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Vol. 19, no. 1 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DiRROS-25421  |
|---|
| UDC: | 616.61 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 2048-8513 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.1093/ckj/sfaf392  |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 265358083  |
|---|
| Note: | Nasl. z nasl. zaslona;
Opis vira z dne 20. 1. 2026;
|
|---|
| Publication date in DiRROS: | 20.01.2026 |
|---|
| Views: | 191 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 153 |
|---|
| Metadata: |  |
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |