Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Izbira tehnologije strojne sečnje in spravila lesa na strmih terenih
Authors:ID Pajek, Luka (Author)
ID Krč, Janez (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (1,73 MB)
MD5: FE4213CF6328DBDAE742132495BF3D5E
 
Language:Slovenian
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo SciVie - Slovenian Forestry Institute
Abstract:Zaradi potrebe po vse večji humanizaciji dela in vsesplošnem pomanjkanju delavcev, se povečuje delež strojne sečnje in spravila lesa tudi na strmih terenih. Analizirali smo možnost uporabe različnih tehnoloških rešitev za delo na strmih terenih. Nabor in vrednotenje tehnoloških rešitev smo povzeli po nemški raziskavi (Findeisen, 2008). Na podlagi primerjave razpoložljivih modelov tehnoloških rešitev smo v prvi fazi izmed 19 izbrali pet modelov: 1) stroj za sečnjo in zgibni polprikoličar, 2) stroj za sečnjo z gosenicami in zgibni polprikoličar z vitlom za povečanje oprijema, 3) model z motorno žago, strojem za sečnjo z gosenicami in zgibni polprikoličar z vitlom za povečanje oprijema, 4) model v kombinaciji žičnice in motorne žage ter 5) sedlasti traktor s procesorsko glavo. Dodali smo še model 6) model z motorno žago, strojem za sečnjo z vitlom za povečanje oprijema in zgibni polprikoličar z vitlom za povečanje oprijema, ker je bil v preteklosti že uporabljen na izbranem delovišču. Glede na razmere na konkretnem delovišču smo izbranim modelom prve faze ocenili njihovo primernost po treh vidikih (ergonomski, okoljski in ekonomski). Za izbrane modele smo izračunali strošek dela, kjer smo upoštevali popravke cene dela, ki izhajajo iz razmer za izvedbo del na delovišču. Rezultati so pokazali, da je za analizirano delovišče najprimernejši model 6, ki omogoča sečnjo debelih dreves na velikih naklonih in izvedbo del na vsej površini delovišča. Medsebojna primerjava različnih tehnoloških rešitev in posledično izbor najbolj primernega tehnološkega modela v danih razmerah je sicer pilotna, a jo ocenjujemo kot koristno pomoč pri načrtnem in uspešnem uvajanju sodobnih tehnologij v slovensko gozdarstvo.
Keywords:strojna sečnja, spravilo lesa, vitel za povečanje oprijema, strmi tereni, ergonomski vpliv, okoljski vpliv
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:17.12.2025
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 11-24
Numbering:Vol. 137
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-24754 New window
UDC:630*36
ISSN on article:2335-3112
DOI:10.20315/ASetL.137.2 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:261806595 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:17.12.2025
Views:7
Downloads:9
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Acta Silvae et Ligni
Publisher:Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, založba Silva Slovenica, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za lesarstvo
ISSN:2335-3112
COBISS.SI-ID:266761216 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P4-0430-2022
Name:Gozdno-lesna veriga in podnebne spremembe: prehod v krožno biogospodarstvo

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:V4-2209-2022
Name:NAČRTOVANJE TEHNOLOGIJ IN PRESOJA KAKOVOSTI IZVAJANJA DEL V GOZDOVIH V PODPORO BIOGOSPODARSTVU

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:selection of fully mechanized harvesting technology on steep terrain
Abstract:Due to the increasing need to humanize work and the general shortage of labour, the share of mechanized felling and timber extraction is rising, even on steep terrain. We analysed the feasibility of various technological solutions for operations on steep slopes. The selection and evaluation of technological solutions followed the German study by Findeisen (2008). Based on a comparison of available technological models, we initially selected five models out of nineteen: (1) a harvester and an articulated forwarder, (2) a crawler harvester and a forwarder equipped with a traction winch, (3) a model combining a chainsaw, a crawler harvester, and a forwarder with a traction winch, (4) a model combining a cable yarder and a chainsaw, and (5) a specialised skidder with a processor head. A sixth model (chainsaw, harvester with traction winch, and a forwarder with traction winch) was added because it had previously been applied on the selected work site. The selected models were evaluated according to three criteria—ergonomic, environmental, and economic—based on the actual conditions of the work site. For the chosen models, we calculated labour costs, accounting for cost adjustments derived from the characteristics of the terrain. In the second phase of the study, model 6 proved to be the most suitable, as it enables the felling of large diameter trees on steep slopes and thus allows work to be carried out across the entire site. Although the comparison of technological solutions and the subsequent optimization of the model selection is preliminary, we consider it a useful tool for the planned and effective introduction of modern technologies into Slovenian forestry
Keywords:mechanized harvesting, timber forwarding, traction-aid winch, steep slopes, ergonomic impact, environmental impact, economic impact


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Acta Silvae et Ligni

Back