Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Testimony as a Co-Existential Extension of Deliberative Practices
Authors:ID Erzetič, Manca (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (1,80 MB)
MD5: A688D8CBB8417EBD302243BFC5264F48
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (360,80 KB)
MD5: 50D5CF2CD69AE67D5F5E22C9A282125C
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo INR - Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
Abstract:The article focuses on the relevance of testimony for deliberative practices, which can be observed to have been insufficiently emphasized in previous discussions on deliberative communication. This seems important not only when it comes to considering deliberative practices in relation to historical time and its aftermath, but also directly in terms of their contemporary application. Indeed, testimonies can assume a key communicative role in different life situations by appearing in various contexts, and in this way allow for the existential and coexistential extension of deliberative practices. First, I address the issue of conceptualizing the phenomenon of testimony and the relationship between the contexts of witnessing and the conditions of truth-telling, drawing in particular on the considerations by Hans-Georg Gadamer, Klaus Held, Bernhard Waldenfels, and Giorgio Agamben’s discussion of testimony and truth in Quando la casa brucia (2020). I conclude the paper by describing a concrete case of the extension of deliberative practice in relation to the testimony of Marijan Rogić, a former convict in the concentration camp on the island of Goli otok [Barren Island].
Keywords:testimony, deliberative practices, communication, Agamben, Rogić
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:23.07.2025
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 81-100
Numbering:Letn. 34, št. 132/133
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-23614 New window
UDC:141.7
ISSN on article:1318-3362
DOI:10.32022/PHI34.2025.132-133.5 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:246115843 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:11.09.2025
Views:243
Downloads:97
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Phainomena
Publisher:Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Nova revija, Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko
ISSN:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:29705216 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0341
Name:Humanistika in smisel humanosti v vidikih zgodovinskosti in sodobnosti

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J7-4631
Name:Hermenevtični problem razumevanja človeške eksistence in koeksistence v epohi nihilizma

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:I0-0036
Name:Center za promocijo humanistike Inštituta Nove revije

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Project number:CA22149
Name:The Research Network for Interdisciplanary Studies of Transhistorical Deliberative Democracy
Acronym:COST

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Pričevanje kot ko-eksistencialna razširitev deliberativnih praks
Abstract:Članek se osredotoča na relevantnost pričevanja za deliberativne prakse, kjer lahko ugotovimo, da je bila ta téma v prejšnjih razpravah o deliberativni komunikaciji premalo poudarjena. To se zdi pomembno ne samo, ko gre za obravnavo deliberativnih praks v povezavi z zgodovinskim časom in njegovimi nasledki, temveč tudi neposredno z vidika njihove sodobne aplikacije. Pričevanja lahko namreč s tem, da se javljajo v različnih kontekstih (osebnih in medosebnih, dokumentarnih, literarnih, pravnih, zgodovinskih, religioznih itd.), prevzamejo ključno komunikativno vlogo v različnih življenjskih situacijah in na ta način omogočajo eksistencialno in koeksistencialno razširitev deliberativnih praks. V članku se najprej zadržim pri problemu konceptualizacije fenomena pričevanja ter pri razmerju med konteksti pričevanja in pogoji izražanja resnice, pri čemer se opiram zlasti na obravnave Hansa-Georga Gadamerja, Klausa Helda, Bernharda Waldenfelsa ter na Agambenovo razpravo o pričevanju in resnici v knjigi Quando la casa brucia (2020). Prispevek sklenem z deskripcijo konkretnega primera razširitve deliberativne prakse ob pričevanju Marijana Rogića, nekdanjega kaznjenca v koncentracijskem taborišču na Golem otoku
Keywords:pričevanje, deliberativne prakse, komunikacija, Agamben, Rogić


Back