Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Sodelovanje javnosti v postsocialističnih mestih med stagnacijo in napredkom : primer Zagreba in Ljubljane
Authors:ID Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina (Author)
ID Zlatar, Jelena (Author)
ID Nikšič, Matej (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (231,44 KB)
MD5: 1AA96602C8EA1FB80348C69015D9C899
Description: slov.
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (745,01 KB)
MD5: 42BC7FC7727868A07BDD47713B528333
Description: ang.
 
Language:Slovenian
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo UIRS - Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia
Abstract:Sodelovanje javnosti pri urbanistični preobrazbi glavnega mesta je pomemben dejavnik, ki ga je treba upoštevati pri presoji kakovosti demokracije v postsocialističnih državah. V članku avtorji obravnavajo procese sodelovanja javnosti pri taki preobrazbi v dveh postsocialističnih glavnih mestih: v Zagrebu in Ljubljani. Predstavljeni so izsledki izbranih študij primerov v obeh mestih (park Tabor in soseska BS 7 v Ljubljani ter Meštrovićev paviljon in park Savica v Zagrebu), poleg tega so izpostavljene podobnosti in razlike, ugotovljene na podlagi njihove primerjave. Izsledki raziskave iz let 2018 in 2019 kažejo dokaj nizko stopnjo sodelovanja javnosti v Zagrebu. V Ljubljani je bila navedena stopnja višja in tudi pravna podlaga zanjo je bila močnejša, opazna pa je bila delna odvisnost od političnih in gospodarskih dejavnikov. V obeh mestih je bilo sodelovanje javnosti v najbolj neposredni obliki pri aktivnostih nevladnih organizacij in civilnih pobud. Komunikacija med prebivalci in mestno upravo je bila slaba, kar ni spodbudno vplivalo na sodelovanje.
Keywords:mesta, sodelovanje, civilna družba, pobude, Zagreb, Ljubljana, primerjalna metoda
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2021
Year of publishing:2021
Number of pages:str. 5-14, 75-84
Numbering:Letn. 32, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-23203 New window
UDC:352:711.4: 316.772
ISSN on article:0353-6483
DOI:10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2021-32-01-001 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:70014723 New window
Note:Besedilo v slov., prevod v angl.;
Publication date in DiRROS:05.08.2025
Views:415
Downloads:208
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Urbani izziv
Shortened title:Urbani izziv
Publisher:Urbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije
ISSN:0353-6483
COBISS.SI-ID:16588546 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Public participation in post-communist cities between stagnation and progress : the examples of Zagreb and Ljubljana
Abstract:Public participation in the urban transformation of capital cities is an important factor to consider when assessing the quality of democracy in post-communist countries. This study examines participatory processes in two capital cities, Zagreb (Croatia) and Ljubljana (Slovenia). The cases studied are summarized, and similarities and differences are pointed out using the comparative method (Tabor Park and the BS 7 neighbourhood in Ljubljana, and the Meštrović Pavilion and Savica Park in Zagreb). Findings from 2018 and 2019 showed a rather low level of public participation in Zagreb. In Ljubljana, the level of public participation was higher and the legal basis for it stronger, although there was a certain amount of dependence on political and economic factors. In both cities, public participation in its most direct form was present at the level of NGO and civil initiative activities. Residents' communication with the city administration was poor and did not facilitate the participation process.
Keywords:cities, participation process, civil society initiatives, comparative method


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Urbani izziv

Back