Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:The precarious relationship between embodiment and digital religion
Authors:ID Friesen, Tobias (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (329,89 KB)
MD5: ABFEC05D8226C133622176442520E076
 
URL URL - Source URL, visit https://ojs.zrs-kp.si/index.php/poligrafi/article/view/459
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo ZRS Koper - Science and Research Centre Koper
Abstract:This article presents a critique of the prevalent notion that the digital realm is characterized by a condition of disembodiment and excarnation. In order to sub-stantiate its argument, this article initially presents an example of the discourse surrounding the disembodiment thesis, namely Richard Kearney’s considerations of touch in the digital age. In this context, the article uncovers a dominant discur-sive framing of harmonization vs. over-problematization. It then proceeds to exa-mine the work of Thomas Fuchs and his phenomenological critique of virtuality, which also emphasizes the aspect of disembodiment. Lucy Osler presents a coun-terargument to the thesis of disembodiment, simultaneously contributing to both phenomenological and embodiment research. Following Osler, this article argues that embodiment is inherently precarious and that the digital sphere requires a theory of multiple modes of embodiment rather than the creation of a dichotomy between embodiment and the digital. The article concludes with some theoretical considerations of digital religion and theological reflections on the possibility of an online Eucharist, a topic that was prevalent in Christian theology during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords:embodiment, disembodiment, phenomenology, digital religion
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2024
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:str. 33-54
Numbering:Let. 29, št. 113/114
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-21475 New window
UDC:141.7:004
ISSN on article:1318-8828
DOI:10.35469/poligrafi.2024.459 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:225811203 New window
Copyright:Copyright (c) 2024 Tobias Friesen
Publication date in DiRROS:11.02.2025
Views:466
Downloads:247
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Poligrafi : revija za religiologijo, mitologijo in filozofijo
Shortened title:Poligrafi
Publisher:Nova revija, Društvo za primerjalno religiologijo, Nova revija, Društvo za primerjalno religiologijo, Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče, Univerzitetna založba Annales, Društvo za primerjalno religiologijo, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče, Annales ZRS, Društvo za primerjalno religiologijo
ISSN:1318-8828
COBISS.SI-ID:59336192 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Krhki odnos med utelešenostjo in digitalno religijo
Abstract:avtor v članku kritično obravnava prevladujoče mnenje, da digitalni svet za-znamuje stanje breztelesnosti in iztelešenosti oziroma ločenosti od telesa. V pod-krepitev svojih argumentov najprej analizira enega izmed diskurzov, povezanih s tezo o breztelesnosti, in sicer razmišljanja Richarda Kearneyja o dotiku v digitalni dobi. V tej analizi izpostavi prevladujoči diskurzivni vzorec harmonizacije na eni strani in pretiranega problematiziranja na drugi. Nato obravnava delo Thomasa Fuchsa, ki v svoji fenomenološki kritiki virtualnosti prav tako poudarja vidik brezelesnosti. Lucy Osler podaja protiargument tezi o breztelesnosti, s čimer hkra-ti bogati tako fenomenološke raziskave kot raziskave o breztelesnosti. po zgledu Osler avtor zagovarja stališče, da je utelešenost inherentno krhka in da bi bila di-gitalnemu svetu bolj kot ustvarjanje dihotomije med utelešenostjo in digitalnim potrebna teorija o različnih modusih utelešenosti. V zaključku avtor poda nekaj te-oretičnih razmislekov o digitalni religiji in teoloških refleksij o možnosti spletnega obhajanja, kar je bila v krščanski teologiji med pandemijo covida-19 pogosta tema.
Keywords:utelešenost, breztelesnost, fenomenologija, digitalna religija


Back