Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Selbstverteidigung und Selbstbestimmung gegen moralischen Nihilismus im Kontext des Strafrechts
Authors:ID Lahkim Bennani, Azelarabe (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (511,86 KB)
MD5: C515F2111A3182FB311CC3217F47BB81
 
Language:German
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo INR - Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
Abstract:Self-Defense and Self-Determination Against Moral Nihilism in the Context of Criminal Law --- The article concerns the question in what sense does comparative criminal law research confirm the idea that inflation of repressive laws promotes overcriminalization and does not promote trust in the possibility of mutual moral improvement between actors. We will also see to what extent the right to self-defense is recognized in its various forms. Trust in the laws is ensured by the fact that the will to power guarantees the right to self-defense. This is guaranteed by the right to avoid self-accusation. Guilt is not simply a consequence of accusation, coming from society, or of self-incrimination. Guilt does not look in the direction of the past, in the direction of retributive purposes. Rather, it has a prospect of the future, of mutual correction of character and behavior. This calls moral nihilism into question.
Keywords:moral nihilism, self-accusation, Nietzsche, penal law, guilt, Islam
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:23.12.2024
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:str. 211-235
Numbering:Letn. 33, št. 130/131
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-21176 New window
UDC:17
ISSN on article:1318-3362
DOI:10.32022/PHI33.2024.130-131.10 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:220877571 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:09.01.2025
Views:180
Downloads:56
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
LAHKIM BENNANI, Azelarabe, 2024, Selbstverteidigung und Selbstbestimmung gegen moralischen Nihilismus im Kontext des Strafrechts. Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani [online]. 2024. Vol. 33, no. 130/131, p. 211–235. [Accessed 20 April 2025]. DOI 10.32022/PHI33.2024.130-131.10. Retrieved from: https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=21176
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Phainomena
Publisher:Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Nova revija, Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko
ISSN:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:29705216 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0341
Name:Humanistika in smisel humanosti v vidikih zgodovinskosti in sodobnosti
Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J7-4631
Name:Hermenevtični problem razumevanja človeške eksistence in koeksistence v epohi nihilizma
Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:I0-0036
Name:Center za promocijo humanistike Inštituta Nove revije

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Samoobramba in samoopredelitev proti moralnemu nihilizmu v okviru kazenskega prava
Abstract:Članek se ukvarja z vprašanjem, v kakšnem smislu primerjalne kazenskopravne raziskave potrjujejo idejo, da inflacija represivnih zakonov spodbuja pretirano kriminalizacijo in ne spodbuja zaupanja v možnost vzajemnega moralnega izboljšanja med akterji. Preverili bomo tudi, v kolikšni meri je pravica do samoobrambe priznana v njenih različnih oblikah. Zaupanje v zakone zagotavlja dejstvo, da volja do moči jamči pravico do samoobrambe. Slednja je zajamčena s pravico do nesamoobtožbe. Krivda ni zgolj posledica obtožbe, ki prihaja iz družbe, ali samoobdolžitve. Krivda ne gleda v smeri preteklosti, v smeri retributivnih namenov. Nasprotno, usmerjena je v prihodnost, v vzajemno popravljanje značaja in vedênja. To moralni nihilizem postavlja pod vprašaj.
Keywords:moralni nihilizem, samoobtoževanje, Nietzsche, kazensko pravo, krivda, islam


Back