Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Mit Fink am Tisch : Zu Eugen Finks Philosophie der Sozialität
Authors:ID Čapek, Jakub (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (350,87 KB)
MD5: D6ECB09FFB86AACC53D2EC99D15DDFA4
 
Language:German
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo INR - Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
Abstract:With Fink at Table. On Eugen Fink’s Philosophy of Sociality Fink’s philosophy of sociality does not start from the experience of the individual other, but from the primacy of participation in the same world. Fink unfolds this idea in the context of material culture, that is, in his analysis of how we interact with everyday things, such as tables. Such things are not merely objects of use, but can become “meaningful things” that symbolically represent our existence, and they represent it as a fundamentally shared existence. The essay draws attention to the fact that not all sharing, as Fink claims, provides unity. Reference is made to Hannah Arendt’s analysis of the table and the world, which, like Fink, holds that human dependence on objects is essential, with the difference that she ascribes both unifying and separating significance to objects and the world. In the conclusion, some critical observations on Fink are made. Fink did not reflect on the ambiguity in the concept of sharing, and his claim that sharing establishes communal unity is thus rather unfounded. Further, his conviction that philosophy of sociality is based on the cosmological concept of the world is viewed in a critical light, since it tempts one to assume a unity of the world, which, however, is never guaranteed in advance.
Keywords:Fink, sociality, table, world, Arendt
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:29.11.2022
Year of publishing:2022
Number of pages:str. 172-186
Numbering:Letn. 31, št. 122/123
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-20685 New window
UDC:304:1
ISSN on article:1318-3362
DOI:10.32022/PHI31.2022.122-123.8 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:131125251 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:25.10.2024
Views:145
Downloads:43
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Phainomena
Publisher:Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Nova revija, Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko
ISSN:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:29705216 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:S Finkom za mizo : O filozofiji družbenosti pri Eugenu Finku
Abstract:Finkova filozofija družbenosti ne izhaja iz izkustva individualnega drugega, temveč iz primarnosti soudeležbe v istem svetu. Svojo idejo Fink razvija v kontekstu materialne kulture, in sicer v svoji analizi, kako občujemo z vsakdanjimi stvarmi, kakršna je miza. Tovrstne stvari niso samo objekti uporabe, temveč lahko postanejo »pomenljive stvari«, ki simbolično reprezentirajo našo eksistenco; in reprezentirajo jo kot v temelju deležnostno eksistenco. Članek pozornost posveti dejstvu, da sleherno udeleževanje ne zagotavlja, kakor trdi Fink, enotnosti. Sklicujemo se na analizo mize in sveta pri Hannah Arendt, ki, tako kot Fink, pravi, da je človeško zanašanje na objekte sicer bistveno, a pri tem, v nasprotju z njim, objektom in svetu pripisuje tako poenotujočo kot razločujočo pomenskost. V zaključku predstavimo nekaj kritičnih pogledov na Finkovo misel. Fink ni reflektiral dvoumnosti koncepta deležnosti, zato je njegovo zagotavljanje, da deleženje vzpostavlja skupnostno enotnost, pravzaprav neutemeljeno. Tudi njegovo prepričanje, da filozofija družbenosti temelji na kozmološkem konceptu sveta, razgrnemo v kritični luči, saj navaja k privzetju enotnosti sveta, ki nikakor nikdar ni zagotovljena vnaprej.
Keywords:Fink, družbenost, miza, svet, Arendt


Back