Search the repository

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Keywords: pljučni rak, presejalni programi, onkologija
Published in DiRROS: 19.11.2025; Views: 223; Downloads: 76
Full text (81,92 KB)

Abstract: Background. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) precisely and non-invasively delivers ablative radiationdose to tumors in early-stage lung cancer patients who are not candidates for surgery or refuse it. The aim of researchwas to evaluate local control, overall survival (OS), local progression free survival (LPFS), distant metastases free survival(DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) and toxicity in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT in a single tertiarycancer centre.Patients and methods. We retrospectively evaluated medical records and radiation treatment plan parametersof 228 tumors irradiated in 206 early-stage lung cancer patients between 2016 and 2021 at the Institute of OncologyLjubljana.Results. After 25 months of median follow up, 68 of 206 (33%) patients died. Median OS was 46 months (CI 36 −56),1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS were 87%, 74% and 62% and 5-year OS was 31%. A total of 45 disease progressions havebeen identified in 41 patients. Local progress only was noticed in 5 (2%) patients, systemic progress in 32 (16%) andcombined systemic and local in 4 (2%) patients. Local control rate (LCR) at 1 year was 98%, at 2 and 3 years 96%and 95% at 5 years. The 1-, 2- and 3-year LPFS were 98%, 96% and 94%, respectively and 5-year LPFS was 82%. One,2-, 3- and 5-year DFS w ere 89%, 81%, 72% and 49%, respectively. Among 28 toxicities recorded only one was Grade4 (pneumonitis), all others were Grade 1 or 2. No differences in LCR, LPFS, DFS were found in univariate analysis com-paring patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. For OS the only statistically significant difference was found inpatients with more than 3 comorbidities compared to those with less comorbidities.Conclusions. Early lung cancer treated with SBRT at single tertiary cancer centre showed that LCR, LPFS, DFS, DMFSand OS were comparable to published studies. Patients with many comorbidities had significantly worse overallsurvival compared to those with less comorbidities. No other significant differences by patient, tumor, or treatmentcharacteristics were found for DMFS, LPFS, and DFS. Toxicity data confirmed that treatment was well tolerated.
Keywords: stereotactic body radiotherapy, early-stage lung cancer, lung cancer
Published in DiRROS: 25.07.2024; Views: 1067; Downloads: 604
Full text (326,62 KB)
This document has many files! More...

Abstract: Chemoradiotherapy (ChT-RT) followed by 12-month durvalumab is the new standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Survival data for patients from everyday routine clinical practice is scarce, as well as potential impact on treatment efficacy of sequential or concomitant chemotherapy and the us-age of gemcitabine.Patients and methods. We retrospectively analysed unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who were treated with durvalumab after radical concurrent or sequential chemotherapy (ChT) from December 2017 and completed treat-ment until December 2020. We assessed progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity regarding baseline characteristic of patients.Results. Eighty-five patients with median age of 63 years of which 70.6% were male, 56.5% in stage IIIB and 58.8% with squamous cell carcinoma, were included in the analysis. Thirty-one patients received sequential ChT only, 51 patients received induction and concurrent ChT and 3 patients received concurrent ChT only. Seventy-nine patients (92.9%) received gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy and switched to etoposide and cisplatin during con-current treatment with radiotherapy (RT). Patients started durvalumab after a median of 57 days (range 12–99 days) from the end of the RT and were treated with the median of 10.8 (range 0.5–12 months) months. Forty-one patients (48.2%) completed treatment with planned 12-month therapy, 25 patients (29.4%) completed treatment early due to the toxicity and 16 patients (18.8%) due to the disease progression. Median PFS was 22.0 months, 12- and estimated 24-month PFS were 71% (95% CI: 61.2–80.8%) and 45.8% (95% CI: 32.7–58.9%). With the median follow-up time of 23 months (range 2–35 months), median OS has not been reached. Twelve- and estimated 24-month OS were 86.7% (95% CI: 79.5–93.9%) and 68.6% (95% CI: 57.2–79.9%).Conclusions. Our survival data are comparable with published research as well as with recently published real-world reports. Additionally, the regimen with gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy as induction treatment was efficient and well tolerated.
Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer, stage III, chemoradiotherapy, durvalumab, acute toxicity
Published in DiRROS: 23.07.2024; Views: 1231; Downloads: 354
Full text (394,39 KB)

Abstract: Consolidation radiotherapy (cRT) in extended disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) showed improved 2-year overall survival in patients who responded to chemotherapy (ChT) in CREST trial, however results of two meta - analysis were contradictive. Recently, immunotherapy was introduced to the treatment of ED-SCLC, making the role of cRT even more unclear. The aim of our study was to access if consolidation thoracic irradiation improves survival of ED-SCLC patients treated in a routine clinical practice and to study the impact of cRT dose on survival. We also discuss the future role of cRT in the era of immunotherapy. Patients and methods. We retrospectively reviewed 704 consecutive medical records of patients with small cell lung cancer treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana from January 2010 to December 2014 with median follow up of 65 months. We analyzed median overall survival (mOS) of patients with ED-SCLC treated with ChT only and those treated with ChT and cRT. We also compared mOS of patients treated with different consolidation doses and performed univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Results. Out of 412 patients with ED-SCLC, ChT with cRT was delivered to 74 patients and ChT only to 113 patients. Patients with cRT had significantly longer mOS compared to patients with ChT only, 11.1 months (CI 10.1%12.0) vs. 7.6 months (CI 6.9%8.5, p < 0.001) and longer 1-year OS (44% vs. 23%, p = 0.0025), while the difference in 2-year OS was not significantly different (10% vs. 5%, p = 0.19). The cRT dose was not uniform. Higher dose with 45 Gy (in 18 fractions) resulted in better mOS compared to lower doses 30%36 Gy (in 10%12 fractions), 17.2 months vs. 10.3 months (p = 0.03) and statistically significant difference was also seen for 1-year OS (68% vs. 30%, p = 0.01) but non significant for 2-year OS (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.11). Conclusions. Consolidation RT improved mOS and 1-year OS in ED-SCLC as compared to ChT alone. Higher dose of cRT resulted in better mOS and 1-year OS compared to lower dose. Consolidation RT, higher number of ChT cycles and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were independent prognostic factors for better survival in our analysis. For patients who received cRT, only higher doses and PCI had impact on survival regardless of number of ChT cycles received. Role of cRT in the era of immunotherapy is unknown and should be exploited in further trials.
Keywords: radiotherapy, small lung cancer, clinical cases, immunotherapy
Published in DiRROS: 16.07.2024; Views: 1090; Downloads: 374
Full text (458,53 KB)

Keywords: EGFR mutations, non-small cell lung cancer, survival, metastases
Published in DiRROS: 05.07.2024; Views: 1059; Downloads: 353
Full text (407,85 KB)