Search the repository

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Abstract: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are gaining importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in the reporting of symptoms between patients via mobile application (m-app) and doctor assessments. Additionally, usability and satisfaction with the use of the m-app were assessed. Methods: In this single-center prospective cohort study, we analyzed ePROs in 46 patients receiving (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Patients recorded the occurrence and intensity of symptoms via the Android-based m-app daily. Three-monthly, patients completed validated quality of life questionnaires (EORTC C30 and BR23). For the 10 most common symptoms reported by patients, we compared the frequencies and grades between patients and doctors. Additionally, we compared daily symptom reports with questionnaire results. Finally, the usefulness of and level of satisfaction with the m-app by patients and doctors were evaluated. Results: During the study, patients recorded almost twice as many different symptoms through the m-app as doctors did in the electronic health records (75 vs 49). Symptoms were described by patients as mild (67%), moderate (30%), or severe (3%). The frequency and intensity of symptoms reported by patients were significantly higher than those reported by doctors (p<0.001). Fatigue, insomnia and dry mouth were the three main symptoms reported in more than 75% of patients, but insomnia and dry mouth were also the symptoms most often underreported by doctors. After three months of chemotherapy, QoL assessments revealed worsening of physical, social, cognitive and role functioning, increased fatigue, systemic therapy side effects, and dyspnea but a reduction in arm and shoulder problems. Patients and doctors rated the m-app with an overall score of 4.5 out of 5 (IQR 1.0). Patients expressed high levels of satisfaction with and usability of the m-app. In contrast, doctors were somewhat reluctant to perceive ePROs as an additional burden with patient management. Conclusion: This study revealed a significant discrepancy between patients’ daily symptom reports via the m-app and doctors’ assessments, indicating that healthcare professionals may not fully capture patients’ experiences. This underscores the importance of integrating PROs to accurately evaluate patients’ conditions. Our m-app serves as a promising tool for reporting and managing side effects during systemic treatment of breast cancer.
Keywords: breast cancer, mobile application, patients, doctors
Published in DiRROS: 05.12.2025; Views: 75; Downloads: 23
Link to file

Abstract: Background: Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) serve as important biomarkers for disease monitoring and treatment response in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Their detection remains challenging because of their low abundance, phenotypic diversity and non-standardized mode of detection. Cytopathological Giemsa and Immunofluorescence (IF) staining can offer complementary approaches for CTC characterization. Giemsa staining enables assessment of cellular morphology, while IF allows for marker-specific identification, together providing a more comprehensive and accurate evaluation of CTCs. Methods: We developed an IF staining protocol with antibodies against Cytokeratin (CK), vimentin (VIM), and Cluster of Differentiation 45 (CD45) to distinguish epithelial, mesenchymal, hybrid and hematopoietic cells for CTC detection and characterization and compared it with cytopathologic method of detection via Giemsa staining with regard to CTC detection rates and morphological detail. Results: Study was performed on the samples of 29 heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (median duration of metastatic disease 19.4 months). Giemsa staining enabled the detection of a higher number of CTCs compared to our IF protocol. Lower detection rate was potentially due to the loss of fragile or loosely adherent cells during methanol fixation and IF staining. Additionally, in IF-stained samples, some CTCs presented faint nuclear signals, potentially impairing their recognition. The IF staining supported the identity of CTCs detected on Giemsa-stained slides by employing a three-color antibody panel-based approach and allowed detailed phenotypic discrimination and structural analysis of CTCs, including the identification of a distinctive CK polarization pattern suggestive of a transitional state during intravasation. Conclusion: Giemsa and IF may thus be complementary rather than mutually exclusive and relying on a single detection approach could underestimate the true CTC burden. An integrative strategy combining both techniques may offer a more comprehensive view of CTC populations in metastatic breast cancer, thereby enhancing diagnostic precision.
Keywords: biomarkers, breast cancer, circulating tumor cells, cytopathological detection
Published in DiRROS: 05.12.2025; Views: 91; Downloads: 23
Link to file

Abstract: This epidemiological study aims to assess the cancer risk potentially associated with environmental exposure resulting from cement production and waste co-incineration at the Anhovo cement plant in Western Slovenia and to develop a strong and reliable methodological framework for the long-term surveillance of environmentally related cancer risks in small geographical areas. Materials and methods We integrated all the available data sources: cancer cases from the population-based Slovenian Cancer Registry; background population; and available measurements on exposure to air PM10 particles and chromium (Cr) in the soil in the municipality of Kanal and the wider Goriška region. Relative risks of cancer in small geographical areas were estimated using Bayesian hierarchical spatial models and the population attributable fractions of the modelled risk factors were calculated. The point source analysis compared the cancer risk near the cement plant to that in more distant areas. Results The analysis did not reveal any excess cancer incidence in the area of the Anhovo cement plant or an association with the PM10 particles and Cr in the soil. The incidence of mesothelioma remains high in the region, but stable in the last two decades. Conclusions In view of the environmental pollution caused by either historical cement production or the potential impact of current waste co-incineration activities in Kanal, we strongly recommend that a follow-up epidemiological study be carried out in the next 10 to 20 years. The methodological framework established in the present study provides a foundation for the ongoing surveillance of the cancer burden in the region.
Keywords: cancer incidence, environmental exposure, cancer data
Published in DiRROS: 05.12.2025; Views: 60; Downloads: 0

Keywords: epidemiologija raka, presejalni programi, onkologija
Published in DiRROS: 05.12.2025; Views: 66; Downloads: 25
Full text (56,99 KB)

Keywords: rak prostate, presejalni programi, onkologija
Published in DiRROS: 05.12.2025; Views: 79; Downloads: 24
Full text (273,90 KB)