21. Raba lesa, tržne količine in projekcije potencialov okroglega lesa listavcev v SlovenijiŠpela Ščap, Matevž Triplat, 2023, original scientific article Abstract: Gozdarstvo in lesnopredelovalna industrija sta za Slovenijo strateško pomembni gospodarski panogi, ki v zadnjih letih krepita svojo vlogo v biogospodarstvu. Raziskava se osredotoča na problematiko rabe lesa listavcev v Sloveniji. Za akterje, ki se ukvarjajo z rabo lesa listavcev, je pomembno vedenje o razpoložljivi količini domačega lesa, ki se lahko ponudi na trgu. V raziskavi je bila nadgrajena leta 2014 razvita metodologija za oceno količin in potencialov lesa listavcev. Za prihodnje odločanje o razvoju gozdarskega in lesnopredelovalnega sektorja je potrebno tudi raziskovanje tokov lesa, zato je bila v raziskavi opravljena anketa med večjimi predelovalci okroglega lesa listavcev. Ocenjeni teoretični tržni potencial hlodovine listavcev v slovenskih gozdovih je v letu 2021 znašal 0,777 mio m³ in 2,372 mio m³ ocenjeni teoretični tržni potencial lesa slabše kakovosti. Ocenjeni dejanski tržni potencial hlodovine listavcev je v letu 2022 znašal 0,528 mio m³, lesa slabše kakovosti pa 0,741 mio m³. Projekcije potencialov hlodovine listavcev kažejo, da bodo v letu 2025 na trgu podobne količine lesa kot leta 2022. Poraba okroglega lesa listavcev je v letu 2021 znašala 1,433 mio m³, od tega je bilo 0,906 mio m³ lesa predelanega za energetske namene, ostalih 0,527 mio m³ pa v industriji. Rezultati raziskave potrjujejo problematiko rabe lesa listavcev v Sloveniji in nakazujejo priložnosti slovenskega gozdno-lesnega sektorja za prihodnji razvoj.Forestry and wood processing are strategically important industries for Slovenia and have been strengthening their role in the bioeconomy. The study addresses the use of hardwood timber in Slovenia. For actors involved in the use of hardwood timber, it is important to know the available volume of domestic timber that affects the market. For this reason, the survey presented in this work builds on the methodology for estimating the volumes and potentials of hardwood timber developed in 2014. For future decision-making on the development of the forestry and wood-processing sector, it is also essential to analyse wood flows carried out among the major wood processors of round hardwood timber. The estimated theoretical market potential for lower-quality hardwood in Slovenian forests in 2021 was 2.372 million m³, and the estimated theoretical market potential for logs was 0.777 million m³. The estimated real market potential for lower-quality hardwood in 2022 was 0.741 million m³, and for hardwood logs 0.528 million m³. Projections of hardwood potential show that similar volumes of wood will be on the market in 2025 as in 2022. The consumption of round hardwood in 2021 was 1.433 million m³, of which 0.906 million m³ was processed for energy purposes, and the remaining 0.527 million m³ was used in industry. The survey results confirm the concerns about hardwood wood use in Slovenia and indicate opportunities for the future development of the Slovenian forest and wood sector.
Keywords: hardwood, roundwood flows, sawmills, market, potentials
Published in DiRROS: 03.08.2023; Views: 453; Downloads: 268
 Full text (4,01 MB)
This document has many files! More... |
22. |
23. Aktualne cene gozdarskih storitev v Sloveniji - marec 2023Katarina Flajšman, Matevž Triplat, 2023, professional article Keywords: gozdarstvo, gozdovi, gozdarske storitve, cene, sečnja, spravilo lesa, prevoz lesa
Published in DiRROS: 27.07.2023; Views: 784; Downloads: 201
Full text (2,48 MB) |
24. Mednarodni dan gozdov : izsledki našega delaŠpela Ščap, Jaša Saražin, Matevž Triplat, Peter Prislan, Katarina Flajšman, Urban Žitko, Amina Gačo, Darja Stare, Marjan Dolenšek, 2023, professional article Keywords: gozdarstvo, gozdovi, les, dan gozdov, pregled dela
Published in DiRROS: 27.07.2023; Views: 627; Downloads: 208
Full text (6,80 MB) |
25. |
26. |
27. |
28. |
29. |
30. Forest subsidy distribution in five European countriesElena Haeler, Andreas Bolte, Rafael Buchacher, Harri Hänninen, R. Jandl, Artti Juutinen, Katharina Kuhlmey, Mikko Kurttila, Gun Lidestav, Raisa Mäkipää, Lydia Rosenkranz, Matevž Triplat, Urša Vilhar, Kerstin Westin, Silvio Schueler, 2023, original scientific article Abstract: Forest subsidies are widely used to achieve policy objectives aimed at maintaining and supporting the provision of the various ecosystem services provided by forests. In the European Union, an important instrument is the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) within the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), but countries also have national subsidy systems. In both cases, individual countries determine which objectives they want to achieve with the subsidy schemes and which measures are supported. In this comparative study, we investigate which forest-related measures are subsidized across Europe and which forest owners, representing a very heterogeneous group, are involved in the activities of the subsidy systems. We collected data on subsidies paid out for forest-related measures from Austria, Finland, Germany, Slovenia and Sweden from the EAFRD funding period 2014–2020 for a comparison of the funded activities. Further, we analysed how subsidies were distributed among private forest owners with forest holdings of different sizes by performing G-tests to compare the observed with the expected subsidies received by forest owners in the different size categories. The results show that through the flexibility given by the CAP for countries to adjust their subsidy programmes to the specific national needs, EAFRD funds and equivalent national subsidies are indeed used for a wide range of activities instead of only a few following one common European goal. Reflecting the different needs and various forest functions, the subsidized activities range from the more ecology-oriented “investment to increase resistance and the ecological value of forests” to the more management-oriented “purchase of new machinery and new equipment for forestry operations”. In all five countries, small-scale forest owners with holdings smaller than 200 ha are the largest owner group and manage a large share of the forest area in private hands (from 47% in Austria to 97% in Slovenia). However, especially owners of the smallest holdings (< 20 ha) rarely use the funding scheme of the EAFRD framework and thus receive a disproportionately low share of subsidies. There might be several reasons for this. Small-scale forest owners are generally less involved regarding policy issues (including subsidy schemes) than owners of larger forest holdings and may not be aware of all funding opportunities. In addition, the considerable effort to apply, including project preparation, administration and documentation may be perceived as a barrier. It became clear that the current subsidy systems of the countries focus on different forest policy objectives. Our study further revealed that the documentation of subsidy distribution is partly unclear and inconsistent across countries hampering European comparisons. However, understanding current subsidy distribution is urgently needed for increasing the effectiveness of subsidy systems to achieve European policy goals of vital multifunctional forests.
Keywords: European agricultural fund for rural development, EAFRD, policy, incentives, multifunctional forests, small-scale forest owners, bioeconomy
Published in DiRROS: 05.01.2023; Views: 727; Downloads: 427
Full text (628,13 KB)
This document has many files! More... |
