Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:The Latent Implications of Husserl's The idea of Phenomenology
Authors:ID Batiashvili, Irakli (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/E-PHI_34_132-133_2025.pdf
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (263,39 KB)
MD5: 7EA31321F26E363845B06A770172501F
 
Language:English
Typology:1.02 - Review Article
Organization:Logo INR - Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
Abstract:The paper analyzes what new perspectives Edmund Husserl’s famous work The Idea of Phenomenology discloses for philosophical thought. I attempt to explain that the phenomenological epoché is not only a theoretical operation; epoché is, first of all, an existential act of a cardinal character; it denotes a crucial change, which concerns me, in particular, as the person who enters the unique space of phenomenological thinking. I accentuate Husserl’s reasoning regarding the so-called issue of obviousness (evidence) that is of key importance in phenomenology. Obviousness is not my subjective emotional attitude towards something; it is the self-givenness of the object, the direct grasp of the object in pure seeing. The interpretation shows that the method of phenomenological reduction excludes the main paradigm of our thinking: the subject–object split. Phenomenology deals neither with the consciousness of the subject nor with the factual objective reality, nor with their interrelationship, but with the field of pure self-givens. Within this field the self-constitution of the so-called external reality and of essential universals happens, as well as the self-manifestation of my subject or person. However, this field is within a certain totality, which limits it as a horizon: the happening (the event)—das Ereignis—of worldliness.
Keywords:self-givenness, self-constitution, obviousness, happening
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:23.07.2025
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 137-157
Numbering:Letn. 34, št. 132/133
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-23363 New window
UDC:165.62
ISSN on article:1318-3362
DOI:10.32022/PHI34.2025.132-133.8 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:246205955 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:11.09.2025
Views:2075
Downloads:121
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Phainomena
Publisher:Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Nova revija, Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko
ISSN:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:29705216 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0341
Name:Humanistika in smisel humanosti v vidikih zgodovinskosti in sodobnosti

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J7-4631
Name:Hermenevtični problem razumevanja človeške eksistence in koeksistence v epohi nihilizma

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:I0-0036
Name:Center za promocijo humanistike Inštituta Nove revije

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Latentne implikacije Husserlovega dela Ideja fenomenologije
Abstract:Prispevek analizira, kakšne nove perspektive za filozofsko misel razpira znamenito delo Edmunda Husserla Ideja fenomenologije. Skušam razložiti, da fenomenološka epoché ni samo teoretska operacija; epoché je predvsem eksistencialno dejanje odločilnega značaja; zaznamuje poglavitno spremembo, kakršna me posebej zadeva kot osebo, ki vstopa v edinstven prostor fenomenološkega mišljenja. Poudariti želim Husserlovo razmišljanje o t. i. problemu očitnosti (evidence), ki je ključnega pomena za fenomenologijo. Očitnost ni moj subjektiven, čustven odnos do nečesa, temveč je samo-danost objekta, njegovo neposredno zajetje s čistim zrenjem. Interpretacija pokaže, da metoda fenomenološke redukcije izključuje osrednjo paradigmo našega mišljenja: razcep subjekt–objekt. Fenomenologija se ne ukvarja ne s subjektovo zavestjo ne z dejansko objektivno realnostjo, niti z njunim medsebojnim razmerjem, temveč s polje čistih samo-danosti. Znotraj tega polja se dogaja tako avto-konstitucija t. i. zunanje realnosti in bistvenih univerzalij kot tudi avto-manifestacija subjekta ali osebe. Vendar se to polje nahaja znotraj določene totalitete, ki ga omejuje kot njegovo obzorje, in sicer znotraj dogajanja (dogodka) – das Ereignis – svetovnosti
Keywords:samo-danost, avto-konstitucija, očitnost, dogajanje


Back