Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Gnosis and Pistis in Tillich's and Kierkegaard's Philosophical Theology
Authors:ID Briedis, Mindaugas (Author)
Files:URL URL - Source URL, visit https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/E-PHI_34_132-133_2025.pdf
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (238,08 KB)
MD5: DB3612B11D06AD92A1AA14CDF411DEDC
 
Language:English
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo INR - Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
Abstract:The article analyzes and compares the philosophical theology of Kierkegaard and Tillich. They are usually represented as exponents of the same (existentialist-Protestant) tradition, but a different perception of the main questions and possibilitiesfor philosophical theology to answer them guides these philosophers to radically different conclusions regarding the philosophy of religion. A closer look at how they understand faith (pistis) unlocks new possibilities to interpret the ideas of Kierkegaard and Tillich rather than to accept “chrestomathic” analyses. Tillich’s implicit loyalty to Platonic and Hegelian ideas subordinates the existential aspects of his system to answers, which can be described as a “gnostic” understanding of faith and knowledge. This violates the limits for theoretical knowledge set by Kierkegaard. Such a Tillichian ontological loyalty explains that an ontological search is implicated in every religious experience. This basic presupposition of interaction with the sacred for Tillich lets us view Kierkegaard’s famous interpretation of biblical myths critically, and to argue that these stories do not mean that the only possible faith is “blind” faith. This opens a path for Tillich to rationalize every aspect of Christianity and to talk about “true God,” God beyond the gods of actual religions.
Keywords:Paul Tillich, Søren Kierkegaard, faith, knowledge, religious experience, theology
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:23.07.2025
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 119-135
Numbering:Letn. 34, št. 132/133
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-23360 New window
UDC:1:2-1“20”
ISSN on article:1318-3362
DOI:10.32022/PHI34.2025.132-133.7 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:246192131 New window
Publication date in DiRROS:11.09.2025
Views:311
Downloads:133
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Phainomena : [glasilo Fenomenološkega društva v Ljubljani
Shortened title:Phainomena
Publisher:Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Fenomenološko društvo [etc.], Nova revija, Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko
ISSN:1318-3362
COBISS.SI-ID:29705216 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0341
Name:Humanistika in smisel humanosti v vidikih zgodovinskosti in sodobnosti

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J7-4631
Name:Hermenevtični problem razumevanja človeške eksistence in koeksistence v epohi nihilizma

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:I0-0036
Name:Center za promocijo humanistike Inštituta Nove revije

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Gnosis in pistis v Tillichovi in Kierkegaardovi filozofski teologiji
Abstract:Članek analizira in primerja filozofsko teologijo pri Kierkegaardu in Tillichu. Navadno oba razumemo kot predstavnika iste (eksistencialistično-protestantske) tradicije, a različno dojemanje poglavitnih vprašanj in možnosti, da filozofska teologija odgovori nanje, je oba misleca vodilo k radikalno drugačnim zaključkom glede filozofije religije. Natančnejši vpogled v to, kako razumeta vero (pistis), razpira nove možnosti interpretacije Kierkegaardovih in Tillichovih idej, namesto da bi preprosto sprejeli »hrestomatične« analize. Tillichova implicitna zvestoba platonskim in heglovskim idejam eksistencialne vidike njegovega sistema podreja odgovorom, ki jih je mogoče opisati kot »gnostično« razumevanje vere in védenja. To prekoračuje meje teoretskega védenja, kakor jih je začrtal Kierkegaard. Takšna Tillichova ontološka zvestoba pomeni, da sleherno religiozno izkustvo vključuje ontološko iskanje. Po Tillichu tovrstna temeljna predpostavka interakcije s svetim omogoča kritičen pogled na Kierkegaardovo znamenito interpretacijo bibličnih mitov in omogoča zagovor mnenja, da »slepa« vera ni edina možnost njihovega dojetja. S tem se Tillichu odpre pot k racionalizaciji slehernega vidika krščanstva in h govoru o »resničnem bogu«, bogu onkraj bogov dejanskih religij
Keywords:Paul Tillich, Søren Kierkegaard, vera, védenje, religiozno izkustvo, teologija


Back