Digital repository of Slovenian research organisations

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Soobstoj oblikovanja, regulativnega okvira in pogajanj na področju urbanističnega načrtovanja : primer Buenos Airesa, Ciudada de Méxica in São Paula
Authors:ID Ultramari, Clovis (Author)
ID Ludwig, Leandro (Author)
ID Ciociola, Debora (Author)
Files:.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (182,74 KB)
MD5: 666A1AFCE88B30A361AF3B4F63FF62C5
Description: slov.
 
.pdf PDF - Presentation file, download (170,97 KB)
MD5: 702CB8C4C496E45A3DDD3277F16D1CC7
Description: ang.
 
Language:Slovenian
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:Logo UIRS - Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia
Abstract:V strokovni literaturi se pogosto poudarja, da urbanistična kompleksnost temelji na soobstoju naslednjih treh prvin: regulativnega okvira, ravni urbanističnega oblikovanja in pogajanj med akterji. Avtorji se v članku z navedenim strinjajo, hkrati pa zavračajo zamisel, da so lahko te prvine v idealnem ravnovesju, brez negativnih medsebojnih vplivov. Proučevali so, kje so meje njihovega soobstajanja, in postavili hipotezo, da idealen in uravnotežen soobstoj teh prvin ni mogoč. Njihova raziskava je temeljila na naslednjih štirih glavnih in zaporednih aktivnostih: 1. pregledu literature o temeljih sodobnega urbanističnega načrtovanja, 2. kritični kvalitativni analizi glavnih dokumentov, ki vsebujejo urbanistične direktive in se uporabljajo v treh največjih mestih Latinske Amerike: Buenos Airesu, Ciudadu de Méxicu in São Paulu (s poudarkom na smernicah v teh dokumentih in kako obravnavajo vse tri omenjene prvine), 3. analizi součinkovanja navedenih treh prvin in 4. oblikovanju končnih ugotovitev.
Keywords:participativni urbanizem, urbanistični instrumenti, urbanistični pojmi, urbanistične teorije
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2023
Year of publishing:2023
Number of pages:str. 57-66, 119-128
Numbering:Letn. 34, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-23171 New window
UDC:711.4-122(238.1)
ISSN on article:0353-6483
DOI:10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2023-34-01-05 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:156639235 New window
Note:Besedilo v angl., prevod v slov.;
Publication date in DiRROS:04.08.2025
Views:363
Downloads:193
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Urbani izziv
Shortened title:Urbani izziv
Publisher:Urbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije
ISSN:0353-6483
COBISS.SI-ID:16588546 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Coexistence between design, regulation, and negotiation in urban planning : the case of Buenos Aires, Mexico City, and São Paulo
Abstract:Studies commonly reiterate that urban planning complexity is defined by the coexistence of three elements: regulation, various scales of urban design, and multiagent negotiations. We confirm this; however, we reject the idea that they can ideally interact in perfect balance with no negative impact on each other. Thus, this article analyses the limits of coexistence of these elements. We hypothesize that perfect and balanced coexistence is not possible. This is based on four main and consecutive activities: 1) a literature review concerning the roots we believe contemporary urban planning is based on; 2) a critical and qualitative analysis of the main documents containing urban planning directives currently in use by the three largest cities in Latin America (Buenos Aires, Mexico City, and São Paulo) focused on the guidelines established by these documents and how they communicate with each of the three pillars; 3) identification of controversies and convergences in the interaction between the three pillars; and 4) elaboration of conclusions.
Keywords:collaborative urban planning, urban planning concepts, urban planning theories


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Urbani izziv

Back