Digitalni repozitorij raziskovalnih organizacij Slovenije

Izpis gradiva
A+ | A- | Pomoč | SLO | ENG

Naslov:Benchmark DEBORA : Assessment of MCFD compared to high-pressure boiling pipe flow measurements
Avtorji:ID Bois, Guillaume (Avtor)
ID Fillion, P. (Avtor)
ID Burlot, Alan (Avtor)
ID Ben Hadj Ali, A. (Avtor)
ID Khaware, A. (Avtor)
ID Sanyal, J. (Avtor)
ID Rehm, M. (Avtor)
ID Farges, B. (Avtor)
ID Gajšek, Aljoša, Institut "Jožef Stefan" (Avtor)
ID Tekavčič, Matej, Institut "Jožef Stefan" (Avtor)
ID Končar, Boštjan, Institut "Jožef Stefan" (Avtor)
Datoteke:.pdf PDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (2,59 MB)
MD5: 61E3156EDE22BB11BD790792FFA25505
 
Jezik:Angleški jezik
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:Logo IJS - Institut Jožef Stefan
Povzetek:A benchmark activity on two-fluid simulations of high-pressure boiling upward flows in a pipe is performed by 12 participants using different MCFD (Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics) codes and closure relationships. More than 30 conditions from DEBORA experiment conducted by CEA are considered. Each case is characterised by the flow rate, inlet temperature, wall heat flux and outlet pressure. High-pressure Freon (R12) at 14 bar and 26 bar is boiled in a 19.2 mm pipe heated over 3.5 m. Flow rates range from 2000 kg m−2 s −1 to 5000 kg m−2 s −1 and exit quality � ranges from single-phase conditions to � = 0.1 which leads to a peak void fraction of � = 70%. In these high pressure conditions, bubbles remain small and there is no departure from the bubbly flow regime (François et al., 2011; Hösler, 1968). However, different kind of bubbly flows are observed: wall-peak, intermediate peak or core-peak, depending on the case considered. Measurements along the pipe radius near the end of the heated section are compared to code predictions. They include void fraction, bubble mean diameter, vapour velocity and liquid temperature. The benchmark covered two phases. In the first phase of the benchmark activities, experimental data were given to the participants, allowing to compare the simulation results and to develop, to select or to adjust the models in the CMFD codes. The second phase included blind cases where the participants could not compare to the measurements. In between the two phases, possible additional model adjustments or calibrations were performed. Overall, the benchmark involved very different closures and a wide range of models’ complexity was covered. Yet, it is extremely difficult to have a robust closure for all conditions considered, even knowing experimental measurements. The wall-to-core peak transition is not captured consistently by the models. The degree of subcooling and the void fraction level are also difficult to assess
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Verzija publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Poslano v recenzijo:31.01.2024
Datum sprejetja članka:18.07.2024
Datum objave:30.07.2024
Založnik:Elsevier
Leto izida:2024
Št. strani:31 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 179, Art. 104920
Izvor:Nizozemska
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-21785 Novo okno
UDK:621.039
ISSN pri članku:0301-9322
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104920 Novo okno
COBISS.SI-ID:203717635 Novo okno
Avtorske pravice:© 2024 The Author(s).
Datum objave v DiRROS:28.03.2025
Število ogledov:108
Število prenosov:64
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
BOIS, Guillaume, FILLION, P., BURLOT, Alan, BEN HADJ ALI, A., KHAWARE, A., SANYAL, J., REHM, M., FARGES, B., GAJŠEK, Aljoša, TEKAVČIČ, Matej in KONČAR, Boštjan, 2024, Benchmark DEBORA : Assessment of MCFD compared to high-pressure boiling pipe flow measurements. International journal of multiphase flow [na spletu]. 2024. Vol. 179, no. 104920. [Dostopano 8 april 2025]. DOI 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104920. Pridobljeno s: https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=slv&id=21785
Kopiraj citat
  
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share


Podobna dela iz repozitorija:

Ni podobnih del

Podobna dela iz ostalih repozitorijev:

Ni podobnih del

Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:International journal of multiphase flow
Skrajšan naslov:Int. j. multiph. flow
Založnik:Pergamon
ISSN:0301-9322
COBISS.SI-ID:25649408 Novo okno

Gradivo je financirano iz projekta

Financer:ARIS - Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P2-0026
Naslov:Reaktorska tehnika

Financer:ARIS - Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P2-0405
Naslov:Fuzijske tehnologije

Financer:Drugi - Drug financer ali več financerjev
Naslov:NEPTUNE project

Financer:Drugi - Drug financer ali več financerjev
Program financ.:SAFIR2022 Programme

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.
Začetek licenciranja:30.07.2024
Vezano na:VoR

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:jedrska tehnika, hidravlika, pritisk


Nazaj