| Title: | Outcome of MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy - initial experience at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Zebič, Marta (Author)
ID Hertl, Kristijana (Author)
ID Kadivec, Maksimiljan (Author)
ID Čavlek, Miha (Author)
ID Podobnik, Gašper (Author)
ID Snoj, Marko (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  PDF - Presentation file, download (617,87 KB)
MD5: 6C8AD01FCC374E2B331F9CA2F3E76972
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: |  OI - Institute of Oncology
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Background. Like all breast imaging modalities MRI has limited specificity and the positive predictive value for lesions detected by MRI alone ranges between 15 and 50%. MRI guided procedures (needle biopsy, presurgical localisation) are mandatory for suspicious findings visible only at MRI, with potential influence on therapeutic decision. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate our initial clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy as an alternative to surgical excision and to investigate the outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy as a function of the MRI features of the lesions. Patients and methods. In 14 women (median age 51 zears) with 14 MRI-detected lesions, MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was performed. We evaluated the MRI findings that led to biopsy and we investigated the core and postoperative histology results and follow-up data. Results. The biopsy was technically successful in 14 (93%) of 15 women. Of 14 biopsies in 14 women, core histology revealed 6 malignant (6/14, 43%), 6 benign (6/14, 43%) and 2 high-risk (2/14, 14%) lesions. Among the 6 cancer 3 were invasive and 3 were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The probability of malignancy in our experience was higher for non-mass lesion type and for washout and plateau kinetics. Conclusions. Our initial experience confirms that MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy is fast, safe and accurate alternative to surgical biopsy for breast lesions detected at MRI only. |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Publication date: | 01.06.2012 |
|---|
| Publisher: | Association of Radiology and Oncology |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2012 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 97-105, I |
|---|
| Numbering: | Vol. 46, no. 2 |
|---|
| Source: | Ljubljana |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DiRROS-18496  |
|---|
| UDC: | 618.19-006.6-076 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1318-2099 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.2478/v10019-012-0016-0 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 1311099 |
|---|
| Copyright: | by Authors |
|---|
| Note: | Soavtorji: Kristijan Hertl, Maksimilijan Kadivec, Mihael Čavlek, Gašper Podobnik, Marko Snoj;
|
|---|
| Publication date in DiRROS: | 21.03.2024 |
|---|
| Views: | 499 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 147 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
