Search the repository

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Abstract: Introduction Diamine oxidase (DAO) degrades histamine, the key mediator in anaphylaxis, yet its relationship with clonal mast cell disorder (CMD) in the context of anaphylaxis is unclear. We evaluated whether DAO during anaphylaxis differs by CMD status. Methods We enrolled 35 emergency-department patients with acute anaphylaxis to drugs (7 patients), food (2 patients), or Hymenoptera venom (26 patients). Tryptase, DAO, and histamine degradation were measured during anaphylaxis and convalescence. CMD was defined by detecting KIT p.D816V in peripheral blood leukocytes using highly sensitive qPCR. Post-mortem DAO and tryptase were also compared in two fatal Hymenoptera venom-triggered anaphylaxis (HVA) cases with CMD versus 13 non-anaphylaxis controls. Results KIT p.D816V was detected in 6 (17%); all had severe HVA and normal basal tryptase. During anaphylaxis, DAO increased markedly in CMD (median 1142%), but only modestly in KIT p.D816V-negative patients (median 20%; p < 0.0001), independent of trigger or severity. Acute DAO was ~5-fold higher in CMD (median 101 vs. 18 U/mL), while convalescent DAO was similar (both 14 U/mL). Despite markedly elevated DAO, we observed impaired histamine degradation in acute anaphylaxis plasma. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses showed strong discrimination for CMD using acute DAO (AUC 0.92; cut-off 53 U/mL; sensitivity 83%; specificity 97%) and percentage increase from convalescence (AUC 0.97; cut-off 223%; sensitivity 83%; specificity 100%). Post-mortem DAO lacked specificity, whereas post-mortem tryptase supported the diagnosis of fatal anaphylaxis and CMD. Conclusion DAO concentrations rise markedly during anaphylaxis in CMD and may help identify individuals at the highest risk. Further studies should refine the diagnostic utility and elucidate the mechanisms by which DAO may amplify anaphylaxis in CMD.
Keywords: anaphylaxis, clonal mast cell disorder, diamine oxidase, KIT p.D816V, tryptase
Published in DiRROS: 06.05.2026; Views: 83; Downloads: 74
Full text (698,24 KB)
This document has many files! More...

Abstract: Background: The recommended booster third dose of vaccination against COVID-19 in cancer patients seems reasonable to protect them against a severe disease course. A prospective study was designed to assess the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in this cohort. Methods: Patients with solid malignancies on active treatment were followed up after the primary course and booster third dose of vaccination to assess their anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG levels, efficacy in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and safety. Results: Out of 125 patients receiving the primary course of vaccination, 66 patients received a booster third dose of mRNA vaccine, with a 20-fold increase in median anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG levels compared to Ab levels six months post-primary course of vaccination (p < 0.0001). After the booster third dose, anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG levels were comparable to healthy controls (p = 0.113). There was a decline in Ab levels 3 (p = 0.0003) and 6 months (p < 0.0001) post-third booster dose. No patients had either a severe disease course or a lethal outcome in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection after the third booster dose. Conclusion: The third booster vaccination dose against COVID-19 in solid cancer patients triggers substantial immunogenicity and is safe and effective for preventing a severe COVID-19 disease course.
Keywords: solid cancer, COVID-19 vaccination, booster third dose
Published in DiRROS: 25.02.2026; Views: 369; Downloads: 193
Full text (1,55 MB)
This document has many files! More...

Abstract: Diagnosing and prognosing immune-mediated airway diseases, like hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and sarcoidosis, is complicated due to their overlapping symptoms and the lack of definitive biomarkers. Hence, we wanted to compare bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytokine and chemokine profiles from 92 patients with different immune-mediated and inflammatory airway diseases, namely, HP, sarcoidosis, non-allergic asthma, amiodarone lung, and EGPA. We also compared pulmonary function parameters, BAL’s cellularity, and lymphocyte immunophenotypes. We found significant differences across all measured lung functions (VC, VC%, FEV1, FEV1%, and Tiff%) and in the number of macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils. Furthermore, we showed significant differences in CD4, CD8, and CD4/8 across all included ILDs and OLDs; however, no significant differences were found in CD3, CD19, NK, or NKT. We identified nine biomarkers (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, VEGF, angiogenin, C4a, RANTES, and MCP-1) that significantly differ in the BAL of patients with HP and sarcoidosis and showed that RANTES and IL-6 are associated with fibrotic outcome. We have demonstrated that interstitial and obstructive lung diseases differ in cytokine and cellular lung imprint, which may, in the future, enable the determination of the disease subtype and thus the identification of targets for the treatment of individuals or subgroups within diseases.
Keywords: hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis, non-allergic asthma, amiodarone lung, EGPA, cytokines, bronchoalveolar lavage, chemokines, complement anaphylatoxins, angiogenesis-related factors
Published in DiRROS: 05.08.2025; Views: 793; Downloads: 452
Full text (1,19 MB)
This document has many files! More...

Abstract: Upon first exposure to cetuximab, hypersensitivity reactions can occur. We aimed to assess the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) to alpha-gal and cetuximab for predicting severe reactions. We prospectively recruited 38 patients and evaluated sIgE to alpha-gal in all patients before the first application of cetuximab. In all alpha-gal-sensitized patients, we evaluated skin tests to meat extracts, gelatine, and cetuximab and performed BAT with alpha-gal and cetuximab. In 24% (9/38) of patients, sIgE to alpha-gal was >0.10 kUA/L, and 8/9 reacted to the cetuximab. Basophil activation tests with alpha-gal were positive in all sensitized patients and were higher in those with severe reactions (18.3% in grade 4 [n = 4] vs. 1.8% in grade 2 [n = 3] or no reaction [n = 1] at 3.3 ng/mL of alpha-gal; p = 0.03). All patients with severe grade 4 reactions had a positive CD63 BAT response to cetuximab compared to patients with moderate or no reaction, who all had negative BAT (57.7% vs. 0.9% at 500 µg/mL, 63.2% vs. 4.1% at 100 µg/mL, 58.2% vs. 2.7% at 10 µg/mL, and 32.1% vs. 3.3% at 1 µg/mL of cetuximab, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). In summary, before initiating cetuximab treatment, sIgE to alpha-gal should be assessed in all patients. To predict the severity of the reaction and to assess the risk of cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis, we should perform BATs with alpha-gal or more discriminative BATs with cetuximab.
Keywords: alpha-gal, baseline serum tryptase, basophil activation test, cetuximab, drug allergy
Published in DiRROS: 22.07.2025; Views: 1060; Downloads: 528
Full text (768,48 KB)
This document has many files! More...

Abstract: Protein–peptide interactions are an essential player in cellular processes and, thus, of great interest as potential therapeutic agents. However, identifying the protein’s interacting surface has been shown to be a challenging task. Here, we present a methodology for protein–peptide interaction identification, implementing phage panning, next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. One of the uses of this methodology is identification of allergen epitopes, especially suitable for globular inhaled and venom allergens, where their binding capability is determined by the allergen’s conformation, meaning their interaction cannot be properly studied when denatured. A Ph.D. commercial system based on the M13 phage vector was used for the panning process. Utilization of various bioinformatic tools, such as PuLSE, SAROTUP, MEME, Hammock and Pepitope, allowed us to evaluate a large amount of obtained data. Using the described methodology, we identified three peptide clusters representing potential epitopes on the major wasp venom allergen Ves v 5.
Keywords: phage panning, next-generation sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, allergen Ves v 5, epitopes
Published in DiRROS: 02.07.2025; Views: 672; Downloads: 578
Full text (1,63 MB)
This document has many files! More...