1. |
2. |
3. Preimenovanje prelaza Ljubelj v Stari LjubeljMatjaž Geršič, Manca Černivec, Helena Dobrovoljc, 2024, izvirni znanstveni članek Povzetek: prispevku je predstavljeno ime Ljubelj in spreminjanje denotatov imena vse do sodobnosti, ko je imev rabi oziroma v besedilih postalo funkcijsko neučinkovito. Upoštevajoč pobudo Občine Tržič, je Komisijaza standardizacijo zemljepisnih imen Vlade Republike Slovenije spodbudila pripravo strokovnega mne-nja, ki je v tem prispevku predstavljeno tudi z jezikoslovne perspektive, tj. onimizacije (poimenovanja) intransonimizacije (prenosa imena na drugo entiteto).
Objavljeno v DiRROS: 24.06.2026; Ogledov: 279; Prenosov: 178
 Celotno besedilo (1,62 MB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
4. Geographical names and place identity in the Slovenian AlpsMatjaž Geršič, Primož Gašperič, Matija Zorn, 2026, samostojni znanstveni sestavek ali poglavje v monografski publikaciji Povzetek: Geographical names are part of intangible cultural heritage, which communities, groups, and individuals pass on from one generation to another and perpetually reproduce in response to their environment, nature, and history. In mountainous areas, geographical names were very important in the past mainly for three reasons. The first one was orientation in the area, especially for hunters, shepherds, and others living in alpine areas. The second reason is the expression of the national consciousness. Slovenians tried to fight against German influence through geographical names. The third reason is related to natural phenomena, which are mirrored through geographical names. These can be natural disasters, geographical features, and so on, which help in reconstructing landscapes from the past.
Ključne besede: place name, microtoponym, national identity, mountains, Slovenia
Objavljeno v DiRROS: 30.03.2026; Ogledov: 376; Prenosov: 263
Celotno besedilo (5,69 MB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
5. Different languages, different landscapes? Exploring linguistic differences in landscape conceptualizationsPřemysl Mácha, Matjaž Geršič, 2026, izvirni znanstveni članek Povzetek: The goal of the research was to assess whether landscape conceptualization systematically differed across European languages in the context of the linguistic relativity debate. We examined the generalizability of previous findings and evaluated the limits of used methodologies, drawing on a large and diverse sample of 14 languages across 5 linguistic families in Eastern Europe (Slavic, Baltic, Uralic, Romance, Hellenic). Participants were asked to free-list terms associated with three linguistic domains: landscape, animals, and body parts. Mixed ANOVA, pairwise comparisons, frequency distribution, cognitive salience, and semantic network analyses were used to test for relationships and to visualize patterns and differences between languages. We confirmed that the landscape domain was less structured than the domains of animals and body parts. Furthermore, the landscape domain had weaker semantic connections across languages. However, we did not find any systematic differences in landscape conceptualizations across languages that could be clearly attributed to linguistic factors. Rather, we argue that the observed variability is more likely the result of multiple factors – geographical, cultural, and linguistic. Building on previous research, we propose more nuanced methods in future research that integrate qualitative, ethnographic insights with quantitative methods, while accounting for extra-linguistic factors.
Ključne besede: landscape perception, linguistic relativity, Eastern Europe, semantic differences
Objavljeno v DiRROS: 28.03.2026; Ogledov: 428; Prenosov: 268
Celotno besedilo (3,65 MB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
