1. Current status of newborn screening in Southeastern and Central EuropeNika Požun, Daša Perko, Violeta Anastasovska, Tadej Battelino, Ana Drole Torkar, Matej Mlinarič, Žiga Iztok Remec, Barbka Repič-Lampret, Domen Trampuž, Mojca Žerjav-Tanšek, Urh Grošelj, 2026, original scientific article Abstract: Newborn screening (NBS) is a well-established public health program that enables early detection and treatment of rare disorders in newborns, preventing severe complications or death. Despite its recognized importance, the scope and implementation of NBS programs vary across Southeastern (SE) and Central Europe. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of NBS in 16 countries of SE and Central Europe and assess progress since the previous survey in 2021. A structured questionnaire was distributed to national experts between April and December 2025, collecting data on program organization, coverage, diseases included, laboratory methods, confirmatory testing, consent practices, and future expansion plans. All countries reported universal screening for congenital hypothyroidism, except Kosovo, where a national NBS is in the process of being established. Expanded NBS using tandem mass spectrometry was available in Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, North Macedonia, Romania, and Slovenia. Spinal muscular atrophy screening became universal in Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Serbia, and Slovenia. Most countries reported plans for further expansion, with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, severe combined immunodeficiency, spinal muscular atrophy, and cystic fibrosis being the most frequently targeted conditions. Although notable infrastructural progress has been achieved, financial constraints, lack of staff, and organizational barriers remain key challenges. The study’s assessment of program effectiveness was further limited by the absence of region-wide systems for capturing end-to-end performance indicators, such as the age of the infant at treatment initiation or missed cases. Regional collaboration and adoption of best practices are therefore vital to ensure equitable access and continuous advancement of NBS programs.
Keywords: newborn screening, NBS, Southeastern Europe, Central Europe, neonatal screening, expanded NBS program
Published in DiRROS: 06.03.2026; Views: 306; Downloads: 208
 Full text (749,60 KB)
This document has many files! More... |
2. Evaluation of neonatal screening programs for tyrosinemia type 1 worldwideAllysa M. Kuypers, Marelle J. Bouva, J. Gerard Loeber, Anita Boelen, Eugenie Dekkers, Konstantinos Petritis, C. Austin Pickens, Francjan J. van Spronsen, M. Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema, 2024, original scientific article Abstract: In The Netherlands, newborn screening (NBS) for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) uses dried blood spot (DBS) succinylacetone (SUAC) as a biomarker. However, high false-positive (FP) rates and a false-negative (FN) case show that the Dutch TT1 NBS protocol is suboptimal. In search of optimization options, we evaluated the protocols used by other NBS programs and their performance. We distributed an online survey to NBS program representatives worldwide (N = 41). Questions focused on the organization and performance of the programs and on changes since implementation. Thirty-three representatives completed the survey. TT1 incidence ranged from 1/13,636 to 1/750,000. Most NBS samples are taken between 36 and 72 h after birth. Most used biomarkers were DBS SUAC (78.9%), DBS Tyrosine (Tyr; 5.3%), or DBS Tyr with second tier SUAC (15.8%). The pooled median cut-off for SUAC was 1.50 µmol/L (range 0.3–7.0 µmol/L). The median cut-off from programs using laboratory-developed tests was significantly higher (2.63 µmol/L) than the medians from programs using commercial kits (range 1.0–1.7 µmol/L). The pooled median cut-off for Tyr was 216 µmol/L (range 120–600 µmol/L). Overall positive predictive values were 27.3% for SUAC, 1.2% for Tyr solely, and 90.1% for Tyr + SUAC. One FN result was reported for TT1 NBS using SUAC, while three FN results were reported for TT1 NBS using Tyr. The NBS programs for TT1 vary worldwide in terms of analytical methods, biochemical markers, and cut-off values. There is room for improvement through method standardization, cut-off adaptation, and integration of new biomarkers. Further enhancement is likely to be achieved by the application of post-analytical tools
Keywords: tyrosinemia type 1, neonatal screening, dried blood spots, inborn metabolic disease, succinylacetone, tyrosine
Published in DiRROS: 26.02.2026; Views: 277; Downloads: 152
Full text (2,24 MB)
This document has many files! More... |
3. International survey on Phenylketonuria newborn screeningDomen Trampuž, Peter C. J. I. Schielen, Rolf H. Zetterström, Maurizio Scarpa, François Feillet, Viktor Kožich, Trine Tangeraas, Ana Drole Torkar, Matej Mlinarič, Daša Perko, Žiga Iztok Remec, Barbka Repič-Lampret, Tadej Battelino, Urh Grošelj, 2025, original scientific article Abstract: ewborn screening for Phenylketonuria enables early detection and timely treatment with a phenylalanine-restricted diet to prevent severe neurological impairment. Although effective and in use for 60 years, screening, diagnostic, and treatment practices still vary widely across countries and centers. To evaluate the Phenylketonuria newborn screening practices internationally, we designed a survey with questions focusing on the laboratory aspect of the screening system. We analyzed 24 completed surveys from 23 countries. Most participants used the same sampling age range of 48–72 h; they used tandem mass spectrometry and commercial non-derivatized kits to measure phenylalanine (Phe), and had non-negative cut-off values (COV) set mostly at 120 µmol/L of Phe. Participants mostly used genetic analysis of blood and detailed amino acid analysis from blood plasma as their confirmatory methods and set the COV for the initiation of dietary therapy at 360 µmol/L of Phe. There were striking differences in practice as well. While most participants reported a 48–72 h range for age at sampling, that range was overall quite diverse Screening COV varied as well. Additional screening parameters, e.g., the phenylalanine/tyrosine ratio were used by some participants to determine the screening result. Some participants included testing for tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency, or galactosemia in their diagnostic process. Results together showed that there is room to select a best practice from the many practices applied. Such a best practice of PKU-NBS parameters and post-screening parameters could then serve as a generally applicable guideline.
Keywords: phenylketonuria, newborn, neonatal, screening, international, survey, laboratory, methods, cut-off
Published in DiRROS: 04.12.2025; Views: 2315; Downloads: 291
Full text (912,91 KB)
This document has many files! More... |
