1. Immunohistochemistry of pulmonary biomarkers : a perspective from members of the pulmonary pathology societyErik Thunnissen, Timothy Craig Allen, Julien Adam, Dara L. Aisner, Mary Beth Beasley, Alain C. Borczuk, Philip T. Cagle, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Wendy Cooper, Izidor Kern, 2018, original scientific article Abstract: The use of immunohistochemistry for the determination of pulmonary carcinoma biomarkers is a well-established and powerful technique. Immunohistochemisty is readily available in pathology laboratories, is relatively easy to perform and assess, can provide clinically meaningful results very quickly, and is relatively inexpensive. Pulmonary predictive biomarkers provide results essential for timely and accurate therapeutic decision making; for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, predictive immunohistochemistry includes ALK, (ROS1, EGFR in Europe), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) testing. Handling along proper methodologic lines is needed to ensure patients receive the most accurate and representative test outcomes.
Keywords: pulmonary biomarkers, immunohistochemistry, pathology
Published in DiRROS: 17.12.2020; Views: 1106; Downloads: 407
 Link to file |
2. Lung cancer biomarker testing : perspective from EuropeErik Thunnissen, Birgit Weynand, Dalma Udovicic-Gagula, Luka Brčić, Malgorzata Szolkowska, Paul Hofman, Silvana Smojver-Ježek, Sisko Anttila, Fiorella Calabrese, Izidor Kern, 2020, review article Abstract: A questionnaire on biomarker testing previously used in central European countries was extended and distributed in Western and Central European countries to the pathologists participating at the Pulmonary Pathology Society meeting 26-28 June 2019 in Dubrovnik, Croatia. Each country was represented by one responder. For recent biomarkers the availability and reimbursement of diagnoses of molecular alterations in non-small cell lung carcinoma varies widely between different, also western European, countries. Reimbursement of such assessments varies widely between unavailability and payments by the health care system or even pharmaceutical companies. The support for testing from alternative sources, such as the pharmaceutical industry, is no doubt partly compensating for the lack of public health system support, but it is not a viable or long-term solution. Ideally, a structured access to testing and reimbursement should be the aim in order to provide patients with appropriate therapeutic options. As biomarker enabled therapies deliver a 50% better probability of outcome success, improved and unbiased reimbursement remains a major challenge for the future.
Keywords: lung neoplasms -- diagnosis -- therapy -- Europe, lung cancer, predictive testing
Published in DiRROS: 21.09.2020; Views: 1601; Downloads: 1043
 Full text (1,80 MB)
This document has many files! More... |
