20.500.12556/DiRROS-7418 Razmerje med potencialom in donosi v slovenskih gozdovih Ratio between potential and yields in Slovenian forests Gozd ima ekonomsko in socialno vlogo. Ekonomska vloga je pridržana predvsem lastniku gozda, ki jo v naših družbenih razmerah realizira zlasti s prodajo gozdnih lesnih sortimentov. Posek lesa se je v zadnjem obdobju bistveno znižal, temu trendu so sledila tudi vlaganja v gozdove. Delež poseka v prirastku je leta 1998 znašal komaj 40%, z gojitvenimi ukrepi usmerjamo okoli 25% prirastka. Usmerjanje razvoja gozdov je glede na lastništvo popolnoma različno. V zasebnih gozdovih se prirastek akumulira zlasti v najtanjšem debelinskem razredu. Povečanje poseka bolj kot proporcionalno poveča čisti donos iz gozda. Pri 30% zvišanju poseka, se čisti donos poveča za 65%. Višina poseka vpliva tudi na zaposlitev, zlasti na lokalni ravni. Gozdni delavec poleg pokrivanja svojih potreb prispeva v družbeno blagajno okoli 980.000 SIT letno. Nizka intenziteta gospodarjenja z gozdovi ni skladna z vseevropskim procesom o varovanju gozdov v Evropi in ne zdrži holistične in energetske presoje. The forest has economic, ecological and social roles. The economic role is, inthe main, taken up by private owners É in the Slovenian social system, this means above all that these owners sell different wood assortments. Woodcuttinghas diminished considerably of late, and this trend has been accompanied by faltering investment into forests. In 1998, incremental fellingamounted to less than 40 % of total felling with about 25 % of the increment directed by forest management. Depending on ownership, Slovenian forests develop in very different directions. In private forests, the increment accumulates mainly in the thinnest stem class. An intensification offelling increases the net profit from forests in a more than linear manner. Thus, a 30 % increase in felling leads to a net profit increase of 65 %. The extent of cutting has an additional impact on employment, in particular, at a local level. Moreover, a forest worker makes a yearly contribution of approx. SIT 980.000 to the state budget. The low intensity of forest management does not comply with the pan European process concerning forest protection in Europe, and does not make sense from an energy and holistic viewpoint. gozd bruto donos čisti donos vlaganje v gozd kalkulacija donosnosti gospodarjenje z gozdom Slovenija gross profit net profit investment into forests profitability calculations forest management Slovenia true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Neznano 2017-07-12 09:14:24 2017-07-12 09:14:24 2022-08-12 13:45:20 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2000 0 0 str. 95-119 Vol. 61 2000 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 630 0351-3114 URN:NBN:SI:doc-D0UNILWE 686246 6206978 zbgl-61-5.pdf zbgl-61-5.pdf 1 FC07E9DAB5682907666720DC3D4230F0 99a000cfb362f06f3d7e2947ac23ef68699697b2054d4091280bbabd4a3ce0fa 0dceef8b-17b5-11ed-b6b8-001a4af901a5 20.500.12556/dirros/a3482efc-570c-4688-a34a-5b17ee518760 https://dirros.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=9268 Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije Acta Silvae et Ligni 0 0 0