20.500.12556/DiRROS-27588 Ugovor vesti pri lekarniških farmacevtih stališča slovenske splošne populacije Conscientious objection among community pharmacists attitudes of the Slovenian general population Uveljavljanje ugovora vesti se nanaša na farmacevte, ki zavračajo izdajo zdravil na podlagi moralnih ali verskih prepričanj, kar generira etične dileme zaradi kolizije farmacevtovega osebnega prepričanja s pravicami pacientov. V raziskavi smo želeli osvetliti stališča slovenske splošne populacije glede te pravice lekarniških farmacevtov. Na podlagi sistematičnega pregleda literature smo pripravili vprašalnik in izvedli spletno anketo na vzorcu slovenske splošne populacije. Predvidevanja, da je lekarniških farmacevtov z ugovorom vesti zelo malo, so se potrdila z redkimi izkušnjami pacientov. Večina anketirancev je v okviru raziskave za ugovor vesti farmacevtov slišala prvič, a jih je 65 % izražalo pozitiven odnos do omogočanja uveljavljanja ugovora vesti lekarniškim farmacevtom, v večji meri so v splošnem ugovoru vesti naklonjeni nižje izobraženi in verniki. Hkrati je večina anketirancev pričakovala zagotovljeno izdajo zdravil, bodisi s strani farmacevta z ugovorom vesti, pri čemer bi prevladala pravica pacienta nad prepričanji farmacevta, ali drugega farmacevta v lekarni. The exercise of conscientious objection applies to pharmacists who refuse to dispense medications based on moral or religious beliefs, creating ethical dilemmas due to the conflict between the pharmacist’s personal convictions and patients’ rights. This study aimed to explore the attitudes of the Slovenian general population regarding this right among community pharmacists. A questionnaire was developed based on a systematic literature review, and an online survey was conducted on a sample of the Slovenian general population. The assumption that very few community pharmacists invoke conscientious objection was confirmed by the rare experiences reported by patients. Most respondents had heard about conscientious objection among pharmacists for the first time in this study, yet 65% supported allowing pharmacists to exercise this right. Support was higher among religious and less-educated individuals. However, most respondents expected guaranteed medication access, either from the objecting pharmacist, prioritizing patient rights, or from another pharmacist within the pharmacy. lekarniški farmacevti spletna anketa splošna populacija ugovor vesti community pharmacists conscientious objection general population online survey true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Neznano 2026-02-13 16:02:10 2026-02-13 16:02:10 2026-02-14 04:04:37 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 str. 160-169 št. 3 Letn. 76 julij 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2025-07-01 615.15:342.731 0014-8229 245744387 ugovor.pdf ugovor.pdf 1 C55D0C485CD641DE184A854FD616B567 36d3aeb9b71c242edb6d5e4a53dfe0cfc755dabe409fdc23e901164dddf02e61 fad69b1a-08ec-11f1-bcbc-001a4af901a5 https://dirros.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=40432 Slovensko farmacevtsko društvo Farmacevtski vestnik 0 0 0