20.500.12556/DiRROS-25254 Uveljavitev monološke strukture v slovenskem zgodovinopisju The establishment of the monological structure in Slovenian historiography V obdobju po 2. svetovni vojni je v slovenskem zgodovinopisju za nekaj desetletij povsem prevladala monološka struktura. Različne raziskovalne paradigme niso bile niti načeloma v enakem izhodiščnem položaju. Janko Orožen je takšno stanje označil za »grafenauerjevsko diktaturo«. Medievalist Bogo Grafenauer je namreč imel v slovenskem historiografskem prostoru po drugi svetovni vojni največjo moč. Na njegovo prevlado, ki se je kazala v urednikovanju Zgodovinskega časopisa – v uredništvu sprva ni bilo niti najuglednejšega tedanjega medievalista Milka Kosa –, so vplivali zunanji in notranji dejavniki. Med prvimi je treba navesti radikalni monologizem komunističnih oblasti. Grafenauer je marksistom priznaval primat pri raziskovanju časa od sredine 18. stoletja dalje. Sam se je večkrat skliceval na marksistično terminologijo (razredni boj, vojaška demokracija), čeprav v svojem izhodišču ni bil marksist. Med notranjimi razlogi za prevlado monološke strukture pa je treba navesti njeno tradicijo, ki jo je v slovenskem zgodovinopisju že po 1. svetovni vojni poskušal uveljaviti Ljudmil Hauptmann. In the period after the Second World War, Slovenian historiography became completely dominated by the monological structure for a few decades. Various research paradigms were not in in the same starting position even in principle. Janko Orožen characterised such a state as the “Grafenauer dictatorship”. This notion is based on the fact that medievalist Bogo Grafenauer was the most influential person in the Slovenian historiographical circle after the Second World War. His dominance, which was evident in his position as an editor of the Historical Review—the editorial board initially did not include even the most prominent medievalist of that time, Milko Kos—, was influenced by external and internal factors. The main external factor was the radical monologism of communist authorities. Grafenauer recognised Marxists as having a leading role in researching history from the mid-18th century on. Furthermore, he often referenced Marxist terminology (class struggle, military democracy) despite not being a Marxist initially. The internal factors for the dominance of the monological structure include its tradition; attempts at establishing tradition in Slovenian historiography are attributed to Ljudmil Hauptmann who tried to do so after the First World War. monološka struktura zgodovinopisje Ljudmil Hauptmann Josip Mal Milko Kos Bogo Grafenauer monological structure historiography Ljudmil Hauptmann Josip Mal Milko Kos Bogo Grafenauer true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Študijski center za narodno spravo Neznano 2026-01-14 12:36:44 2026-01-14 12:46:36 2026-02-07 03:46:37 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2018 0 0 str. 17-65 št. 1 Letn. 2 2018 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2018-01-01 94(497.4)"19" 2591-1201 43250989 Dileme_2018,_st.1._Igor_Grdina.pdf Dileme_2018,_st.1._Igor_Grdina.pdf 1 E8733E35DE8772D4E12B480751BB4E2F bc82d512fabef206da4a161990f467b88e97dae2e89208e9b77557797375df4b 7a6c091c-f13e-11f0-94a7-001a4af901a5 https://dirros.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=38128 Študijski center za narodno spravo 0 0 0