20.500.12556/DiRROS-23363 The Latent Implications of Husserl's The idea of Phenomenology Latentne implikacije Husserlovega dela Ideja fenomenologije The paper analyzes what new perspectives Edmund Husserl’s famous work The Idea of Phenomenology discloses for philosophical thought. I attempt to explain that the phenomenological epoché is not only a theoretical operation; epoché is, first of all, an existential act of a cardinal character; it denotes a crucial change, which concerns me, in particular, as the person who enters the unique space of phenomenological thinking. I accentuate Husserl’s reasoning regarding the so-called issue of obviousness (evidence) that is of key importance in phenomenology. Obviousness is not my subjective emotional attitude towards something; it is the self-givenness of the object, the direct grasp of the object in pure seeing. The interpretation shows that the method of phenomenological reduction excludes the main paradigm of our thinking: the subject–object split. Phenomenology deals neither with the consciousness of the subject nor with the factual objective reality, nor with their interrelationship, but with the field of pure self-givens. Within this field the self-constitution of the so-called external reality and of essential universals happens, as well as the self-manifestation of my subject or person. However, this field is within a certain totality, which limits it as a horizon: the happening (the event)—das Ereignis—of worldliness. Prispevek analizira, kakšne nove perspektive za filozofsko misel razpira znamenito delo Edmunda Husserla Ideja fenomenologije. Skušam razložiti, da fenomenološka epoché ni samo teoretska operacija; epoché je predvsem eksistencialno dejanje odločilnega značaja; zaznamuje poglavitno spremembo, kakršna me posebej zadeva kot osebo, ki vstopa v edinstven prostor fenomenološkega mišljenja. Poudariti želim Husserlovo razmišljanje o t. i. problemu očitnosti (evidence), ki je ključnega pomena za fenomenologijo. Očitnost ni moj subjektiven, čustven odnos do nečesa, temveč je samo-danost objekta, njegovo neposredno zajetje s čistim zrenjem. Interpretacija pokaže, da metoda fenomenološke redukcije izključuje osrednjo paradigmo našega mišljenja: razcep subjekt–objekt. Fenomenologija se ne ukvarja ne s subjektovo zavestjo ne z dejansko objektivno realnostjo, niti z njunim medsebojnim razmerjem, temveč s polje čistih samo-danosti. Znotraj tega polja se dogaja tako avto-konstitucija t. i. zunanje realnosti in bistvenih univerzalij kot tudi avto-manifestacija subjekta ali osebe. Vendar se to polje nahaja znotraj določene totalitete, ki ga omejuje kot njegovo obzorje, in sicer znotraj dogajanja (dogodka) – das Ereignis – svetovnosti self-givenness self-constitution obviousness happening samo-danost avto-konstitucija očitnost dogajanje true false true Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Neznano 2025-08-22 03:45:43 2025-09-11 19:12:01 2025-10-24 03:54:13 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 str. 137-157 št. 132/133 Letn. 34 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2025-07-23 165.62 1318-3362 10.32022/PHI34.2025.132-133.8 246205955 https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/E-PHI_34_132-133_2025.pdf 1 b7a0016d-7ef9-11f0-9bb7-001a4af901a5 https://dirros.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=34532 08_E-PHI_132-133_Batiashvili.pdf 08_E-PHI_132-133_Batiashvili.pdf 1 7EA31321F26E363845B06A770172501F d7ebdebc5e9af463881b61b7f4a94a3fb56f6f51bf961b8998ae31985126b89a 75efa019-8f26-11f0-9bb7-001a4af901a5 https://dirros.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=34933 Inštitut Nove revije, zavod za humanistiko 0 0 0