20.500.12556/DiRROS-21924 Značilnosti revolucionarnega sodstva Characteristics of the revolutionary judicary V totalitarnih državah je vse podrejeno določeni ideologiji in diktatorju oz. stranki. Velja enotnost oblasti. Zločin je del sistema. Kršitve človekovih pravic so na dnevnem redu. Obstaja močna politična policija. Zelo učinkovita metoda represije so politično motivirani (oz. montirani) sodni procesi, katerih namen sta izločitev dejanskih in domnevnih nasprotnikov ter ustrahovanje ljudi. Procesi se samo navidezno odvijajo po pravnih normah, dejansko pa njihov potek in izid diktira diktator ali stranka. Med drugo svetovno vojno je potekal Kočevski proces, ki je bil vzorec za povojne montirane procese v Sloveniji. Ni se odvijal po pravnih normah: v preiskavi in poteku so se kršile človekove pravice, upoštevale so se samo priče in dokazi, ki so obremenjevali obtožence, obtožnica je bila izročena prepozno, kar je onemogočalo pripravo na obrambo, zagovorniki so bili v konfliktu interesov, sodili so sodniki laiki. Sploh pa je bilo sodišče v Kočevju brez pravne podlage, ker je še obstajala Kraljevina Jugoslavija. In totalitarian countries, everything is subordinated to a certain ideology and dictator or party. The powers of the state are unified. Crime is part of the system. Violations of human rights occur daily. Strong political police forces are present. An effective method of repression are politically motivated trials (or show trials); their purpose is to eliminate actual and alleged enemies and to intimidate people. The trials are only seemingly being carried out in accordance with legal norms. In reality, their course and outcome are dictated either by the dictator or the party. During the Second World War, the Kočevje trial took place. It served as an example for all post-war show trials in Slovenia. It was not carried out in accordance with legal norms: in the investigation and the actual trial, human rights were violated, only witnesses and evidence that incriminated the accused were considered, the indictment was issued too late which prevented the accused from preparing their defence, the defending counsels faced a conflict of interests, the judges were lay judges. Additionally, the court in Kočevje had no legal basis since the Kingdom of Yugoslavia still existed at the time. politično motivirani sodni procesi Lenin Edvard Kardelj stalinistični procesi Kočevski proces VOS 16. september 1941 politična policija kršitve človekovih pravic sodniki laiki politically motivated trials Lenin Edvard Kardelj Stalinist trials Kočevje trial Security Intelligence Service—VOS 16 September 1941 political police violations of human rights lay judges true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Študijski center za narodno spravo Neznano 2025-04-10 19:25:36 2025-04-10 19:25:37 2025-10-24 03:50:11 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2017 0 0 str. 119-138 št. 1/2 Letn. 1 2017 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2017-01-01 94:343.19(497.4)"1941/1945" 2591-1201 42514733 DILEME_2017_Tamara_Griesser_Pecar.pdf DILEME_2017_Tamara_Griesser_Pecar.pdf 1 099E52C0C50278D8C25D65FFD4AF4641 cc92ff4e0743f4e85d980d799801c02d3b18d6c3acc5875340fa549c9b4ab4f6 db1929d1-5259-11f0-8080-001a4af901a5 https://dirros.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=33100 Študijski center za narodno spravo 0 0 0