<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Influence of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction on resorption of a large-volume free-fat transplant evaluated using T3D optical scanning</dc:title><dc:creator>Koren,	Matic	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kranjc Brezar,	Simona	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dovšak,	Tadej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Serša,	Gregor	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kansky,	Andrej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ihan Hren,	Nataša	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>lipofilling</dc:subject><dc:subject>murine model</dc:subject><dc:subject>stromal vascular fraction</dc:subject><dc:description>Background and Objectives: The main drawback of lipofilling is fat transplant volume loss, which makes long-term results unreliable. This study’s aim was to assess the influence of an adiposederived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) on volume retention in large-volume fat grafts. Materials and Methods: A murine model was used for the in vivo evaluation of fat-graft volume changes over 6 months. We used 28 immunocompromised nude NU(NCr)-Foxn1nu mice and human fat tissue as a liposuction by-product. Part of the fat tissue was used for SVF preparation. We created a fat transplant without SVF (SVF-) and with SVF (SVF+) groups. Large-volume grafts were injected above the sacrum and scapula in the same animal. Volume loss was evaluated using three-dimensional optical scanning at 14 days (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after transplantation. Scans were processed with Artec Studio software to obtain stereolithography files. The volumes were calculated in RapidForm software 2006. Results: The highest volume loss was observed above the scapula at T3 (SVF- 85%; SVF+ 75%). There was a significant difference in volume between SVF-/SVF+ for grafts above the sacrum at T2, with lower loss in SVF+, and the significance became stronger at T3. The difference in volume loss was also significant above the scapula between SVF-/SVF+ at T3. Conclusions: Although we found a beneficial effect of SVF on the long-term survival of large-volume fat tissue transplants, volume loss due to other contributing factors was high.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2026-08-04 13:04:30</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>31511</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 602</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2076-3417</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app13127100</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 155712515</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
