<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Imputation of untreated LDL-C in treated subjects with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia</dc:title><dc:creator>Mancini,	John	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ryomoto,	Arnold	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ruel,	Isabelle	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Iatan,	Iulia	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Raal,	Frederick J.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Santos,	Raul D.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Grošelj,	Urh	(Sodelavec pri raziskavi)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia</dc:subject><dc:subject>low density lipoprotein-cholesterol</dc:subject><dc:subject>imputation</dc:subject><dc:subject>LDL-receptor</dc:subject><dc:subject>lipid lowering therapy</dc:subject><dc:subject>estimated untreated low-density lipoproteincholesterol</dc:subject><dc:description>Background and aims: Diagnosis of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) relies on untreated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) which is often unknown. We determine whether untreated LDL-C can be imputed from treated LDL-C in HoFH. Methods: Two groups with HoFH were identified: Group 1 (n = 193) from Canada, Brazil and South Africa; Group 2 (n = 206) from the HoFH International Clinical Collaboration. Pre- and post-treatment LDL-C and lipid lowering therapy (LLT) intensity from Group 1 were used to develop a regression model and applied to treated LDL-C in Group 2 to impute pre-treatment LDL-C. The same process was performed in reverse. A final imputation model was created from combining both groups. Results: There was a curvilinear relationship between the expected and observed % lowering of LDL-C on LLT (r = 0.3923, p &lt; 0.0001, Standard Error [SE] = 23 %). Using this relationship, LDL-C was imputed from treated values and showed significant correlation with pre-treatment LDL-C (r = 0.71, p &lt; 0.001; mean values 13.4 ± 4.7 [Standard Deviation] and 13.6 ± 7.3 mmol/L, respectively, ns). Concordance between actual and imputed values ≥ 10 or &lt;10 mmol/L was 80 %. Whereas 36 % of patients had treated LDL-C ≥ 10 mmol/L, 64 % had treated or imputed pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 10 mmol/L. Conclusions: In HoFH, the response to LLT can be quantified and used to impute untreated LDL-C from treated LDL-C. Imputation may augment awareness of possible HoFH in treated subjects lacking records of untreated LDL-C.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-06-02 14:01:14</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>29662</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 616.1</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1879-1484</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.120590</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 280043011</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
