<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Sensory modulation disorder as a diagnostic marker in fibromyalgia: associations with stress and symptom severity</dc:title><dc:creator>Goubar,	Patricija	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Velnar,	Tomaž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>fibromyalgia</dc:subject><dc:subject>sensation disorders</dc:subject><dc:subject>biomarkers/diagnosis</dc:subject><dc:subject>discriminant analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>psychological stress</dc:subject><dc:subject>chronic pain</dc:subject><dc:subject>questionnaires</dc:subject><dc:subject>central nervous system</dc:subject><dc:subject>diagnosis</dc:subject><dc:subject>differential</dc:subject><dc:subject>diagnostic markers</dc:subject><dc:description>Background/Objectives: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a nociplastic pain disorder marked by altered central nervous system processing and abnormal sensory modulation. Diagnosis remains largely symptom-based and lacks objective biomarkers. Sensory modulation disorder (SMD)—impaired regulation of responses to non-noxious input—may represent a clinically relevant diagnostic dimension. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence/diagnostic value of SMD in FM, examine links with symptom severity and stress, and assess its potential for patient stratification. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 182 adults were enrolled (104 FM; 78 controls). Standardized instruments included the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Group comparisons, regression, and discriminant analyses evaluated SMD profiles. Results: Compared with controls, FM adults showed higher sensory sensitivity and avoidance (both p &lt; 0.001), lower sensation seeking (p = 0.002), and modestly higher low registration (p = 0.027). Elevated SMD correlated with greater symptom severity and perceived stress. Stress significantly predicted FM’s impact (β = 0.57, p &lt; 0.001). A discriminant model achieved 84% apparent in-sample accuracy for classifying FM severity from sensory/stress profiles. Conclusions: Sensory modulation abnormalities are highly prevalent in FM and show meaningful associations with symptom severity and stress, suggesting that SMD could represent a potential diagnostic dimension and stratification aid. These findings should be interpreted within an exploratory, cross-sectional design. Incorporating sensory modulation assessment into FM evaluation may improve diagnostic precision, reduce delays, and guide individualized management. Confirmation in larger longitudinal studies is warranted.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-04-10 13:52:44</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>28884</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 616.7-009.7</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2075-4418</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15212700</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 255237635</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
