Efficacy and safety of sepiapterin versus sapropterin in patients with phenylketonuriaGiżewska, Maria (Avtor) Inwood, Anita (Avtor) Tyčová, Renáta (Avtor) Vijay, Suresh (Avtor) Fjellbirkeland, Olivia (Avtor) Grošelj, Urh (Avtor) AMPLIPHYefficacyPKUphenylketonuriaphenylalaninesafetysapropterinsepiapterinAim: AMPLIPHY is the first Phase 3 study comparing sepiapterin versus sapropterin in children and adults with phenylketonuria (PKU). Methods: AMPLIPHY was an international, Phase 3, two-part, open-label study in participants with PKU aged ≥2 years. Participants responsive to sepiapterin (60 mg/kg/day) in Part 1 (≥20% reduction in blood phenylalanine [Phe]) entered Part 2, a crossover treatment period, and were randomized 1:1 to alternative treatment sequences of sepiapterin (60 mg/kg/day, licensed dosage) and sapropterin (20 mg/kg/day, maximum licensed dosage) for 4 weeks each, with a 14-day washout between treatments. The primary endpoint was mean change in blood Phe from baseline to Weeks 3-4 of each treatment period (Part 2). Results: Of 82 participants enrolled, 67 (81.7%) and 62 (75.6%) had reductions in blood Phe ≥20% and ≥ 30%, respectively, in Part 1. Sixty-two participants were randomized in Part 2 (mean [SD] age, 15.8 [10.8] years). In the primary analysis set (≥30% reduction in blood Phe in Part 1, n = 58), mean (SD) baseline blood Phe before sepiapterin and sapropterin treatment was 725.8 (302.1) and 790.4 (370.0) μmol/L, respectively. Least-squares mean (SE) reduction in blood Phe from baseline was -437.0 (28.0) and - 256.6 (28.2) μmol/L, respectively, representing a least-squares mean difference of -180.4 μmol/L (95% CI: -229.5, -131.4; p < 0.0001) and a relative 70% greater reduction with sepiapterin versus sapropterin. Both treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles consistent with previous reports. Conclusions: Sepiapterin was superior to the highest approved dose of sapropterin in lowering blood Phe. No new safety signals were observed.20262026-03-13 14:10:08Neznano28316UDK: 616ISSN pri članku: 1532-8600DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2026.156513COBISS_ID: 267796995sl