<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=32250"><dc:title>Comparative study of azole-based corrosion inhibitors for nickel and copper–nickel alloys in NaCl solution</dc:title><dc:creator>Xie,	Chenyang	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Milošev,	Ingrid	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>nickel alloys</dc:subject><dc:subject>copper alloys</dc:subject><dc:subject>azole-based inhibitors</dc:subject><dc:subject>potentiodynamic polarization</dc:subject><dc:subject>comparative study</dc:subject><dc:description>The corrosion-inhibition performance of seven organic inhibitors on Ni metal, and on CuNi10, CuNi30, and CuNi18Zn20 alloys was studied in 3 wt% NaCl. Electrochemical tests and XPS analyses revealed strong alloy-dependent inhibition. While Ni showed poor response, Cu-rich alloys formed protective Cu–inhibitor layers, with BTAH, SH-Thd-Me, and SH-BimH being optimal for CuNi10, CuNi30, and CuNi18Zn20, respectively. Surface enrichment of Cu is a decisive factor in forming a protective layer with inhibitors. Inhibitor structure and alloy composition jointly influenced film morphology and bonding, highlighting the critical role of alloying in designing corrosion inhibitor protection strategies.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-09-02 13:19:05</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>32250</dc:identifier><dc:source>Nizozemska</dc:source><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© 2026 The Authors.</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
