<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=32161"><dc:title>Cultural heritage as a structural modifier of rooftop solar deployment</dc:title><dc:creator>Stegnar,	Gašper	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Čižman,	Jure	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bevk,	Tadej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Debevec,	Maja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gantar,	Damjana	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>solar cadastre</dc:subject><dc:subject>urban energy planning</dc:subject><dc:subject>decarbonsation</dc:subject><dc:subject>rooftop photovoltaics</dc:subject><dc:description>Cultural-heritage protection constrains rooftop photovoltaic (PV) deployment across a large share of the European building stock, yet existing solar cadastres ignore heritage-related regulatory constraints and therefore systematically overestimate deployable capacity in historic urban environments. This study develops and applies a heritage-aware framework that integrates building-level energy-demand modelling, a geographic information system (GIS)-based rooftop PV cadastre and scenario-based interpretation of heritage regulations to assess realistic decarbonisation pathways for heritage-constrained building stocks. Applied to the Municipality of Maribor, Slovenia (27,249 buildings), the framework shows that formally protected buildings (10.3% of the stock) account for 31.9% of technically suitable rooftop area — more than three times their share. Across five heritage-based scenarios, deployable PV potential ranges from 68% to 93% of the technical baseline (≈308–422 GWh/yr against 452.55 GWh/yr), determined primarily by institutional interpretation rather than the legal framework. Under deep electrification toward 2050, rooftop PV cannot achieve municipal self-sufficiency, leaving a residual gap of 8–22% of demand; notably, deeper renovation without relaxed PV admissibility widens rather than narrows this gap, showing that renovation depth and PV admissibility are complementary policy levers. Heritage protection thus acts as a structural modifier rather than a binary barrier, providing a transferable basis for integrating heritage constraints into solar cadastres, urban energy planning and national renovation strategies.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-08-28 12:29:19</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>32161</dc:identifier><dc:source>Nizozemska</dc:source><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© 2026 The Authors.</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
