<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=31096"><dc:title>Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Slovene version of The Heart failure-specific health literacy scale in patients with heart failure</dc:title><dc:creator>Rebernik Grah,	Klara	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lainščak,	Mitja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Farkaš-Lainščak,	Jerneja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>heart failure</dc:subject><dc:subject>health literacy</dc:subject><dc:description>In this study, we translated and culturally adapted the Heart Failure-Specific Health Literacy Scale
(HFsHLS) and psychometrically evaluated it among Slovenian patients with heart failure (HF). A
cross-sectional study was conducted among 126 outpatients with chronic HF (mean age 69 ± 11 years;
71% male; 63% had LVEF ≤ 40%). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using the
HFsHLS, the Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS), the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale, and
the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the
original three-factor structure (Functional, Communicative, and Critical HL subscales) with
acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.07). The HFsHLS total scale demonstrated acceptable
internal consistency (α = 0.71) and a moderate correlation with the BHLS (ρ = 0.49, p &lt; 0.001), while
correlations with HF knowledge and self-care were weak and non-significant (ρ = 0.12, p = 0.184; ρ =
0.16, p = 0.182). The Functional HL subscale performed best. Overall, the Slovenian version of the
HFsHLS is a valid tool for assessing disease-specific HL in patients with HF.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-07-12 13:38:32</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>31096</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
